The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language for Data Analysis and Graphics
Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713 · Cited by 11,220
Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers
Potts, S. G., Biesmeijer, J. C., Kremen, C., Neumann, P., Schweiger, O., & Kunin, W. E. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007 · Cited by 6,458
Crawley, M. J. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,431
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(1937) · Journal of AOAC INTERNATIONAL · doi:10.1093/jaoac/20.1.142a · Cited by 4,741
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 1×
“As a common unit for sublethal responses, I calculated the ‘response ratio’, R, which is the ratio of mean performance in the dosed and control groups (Hedges et al. 1999) and R = 1 indicates no effect of dosing.”
Crawley, M. J. (2007) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470515075 · Cited by 3,920
The Sublethal Effects of Pesticides on Beneficial Arthropods
Desneux, N., Decourtye, A., & Delpuech, J.-M. (2007) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440 · Cited by 3,553
Mullin, C. A., Frazier, M., Frazier, J. L., Ashcraft, S., Simonds, R., vanEngelsdorp, D., & Pettis, J. S. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009754 · Cited by 1,498
Safeguarding production—losses in major crops and the role of crop protection
Oerke, E.-C., & Dehne, H.-W. (2004) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2003.10.001 · Cited by 1,425
Cited by
Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil
Bonmatin, J.-M., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., Long, E., Marzaro, M., Mitchell, E. A. D., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3332-7 · Cited by 1,372
Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators
Vanbergen, A. J., & Initiative, T. I. P. (2013) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/120126 · Cited by 1,368
Neonicotinoid Pesticide Reduces Bumble Bee Colony Growth and Queen Production
Whitehorn, P. R., O’Connor, S., Wackers, F. L., & Goulson, D. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1215025 · Cited by 1,290
Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment
Blacquière, T., Smagghe, G., van Gestel, C. A. M., & Mommaerts, V. (2012) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-012-0863-x · Cited by 1,039
Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates
Pisa, L. W., Amaral-Rogers, V., Belzunces, L. P., Bonmatin, J. M., Downs, C. A., Goulson, D., Kreutzweiser, D. P., Krupke, C., Liess, M., McField, M., et al. (2015) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-014-3471-x · Cited by 954
Metadata
- Authors
- Cresswell, J. E.
- Venue
- Ecotoxicology
- Published
- 2010-11-16
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-157
- ISSN
- 0963-9292 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3017
- OpenAlex
- W2154162956
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 2.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10646-010-0566-0
- The paper
- Cresswell, J. E. (2011). A meta-analysis of experiments testing the effects of a neonicotinoid insecticide (imidacloprid) on honey bees. Ecotoxicology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-010-0566-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
