The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 1×
“However, in sharp contrast to this assumption, research in metacognition (i.e., Bknowing about knowing^; Flavell 1979; Nelson 1996) suggests that students are often unable to assess their own learning or identify strategies that enhance learning.”
ResultActive learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · Cited by 9,787
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research
Prince, M. (2004) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x · Cited by 7,334 · cited 5×
“The particular methods of active learning used vary in their utility (Prince 2004), although several methods appear to consistently enhance learning (see e.g., Freeman et al. 2014, for a review).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review
O'Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002 · Cited by 2,152
Media will never influence learning
Clark, R. E. (1994) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299088 · Cited by 1,893
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066 · cited 1×
“Such retrieval enhances memory for the retrieved information, compared to rereading that material, a finding known as the testing effect (for reviews, see Roediger 2008; Rowland 2014).”
Cooperative Learning Returns To College What Evidence Is There That It Works?
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998) · Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning · doi:10.1080/00091389809602629 · Cited by 1,011
Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x · Cited by 602
A Cognitive Load Approach to Collaborative Learning: United Brains for Complex Tasks
Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9095-2 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314 · Cited by 526
Chen (2018) · doi:10.1111/medu.13616 · Cited by 348
Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9 · Cited by 211
Improving Student Engagement With Project-Based Learning: A Case Study in Software Engineering
Morais, P., Ferreira, M. J., & Veloso, B. (2021) · IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje · doi:10.1109/rita.2021.3052677 · Cited by 79
Han, I., Ji, H., Jin, S., & Choi, K. (2026) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-025-09434-8 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G.
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2016-01-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-151
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W2223980638
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 210.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
- The paper
- DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped Classrooms: a Review of Key Ideas and Recommendations for Practice. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
