Cited by 136Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and PedagogyInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: The missing link between teacher practices and student achievement?

Ing, Marsha, Webb, Noreen M., Franke, Megan L., Turrou, Angela C., Wong, Jacqueline, Shin, Nami, Fernandez, Cecilia H.·2015·Educational Studies in Mathematics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10649-015-9625-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individual student participation is positively linked to individual student achievement.

    “The study found a positive link between student participation and achievement.”
  • Our findings are more in line with the perspective that classroom discourse affects different students in a class in different ways, depending on how actively they participate.

    “Our findings are thus more in line with the perspective, previously outlined by the studies of Webb et al. (2014) and Ing et al. (2015), that classroom discourse affects different students in a class in different ways, depending on how actively they participate.”
  • Students who intensely verbally participate in class achieve better results than their less vocal schoolmates.

    “Some studies have indicated that students who intensely verbally participate in class achieve better results than their less vocal schoolmates”
  • Students who more often developed their own ideas in conversation and explained their ideas to others achieved better results in standardized mathematics tests.

    “The findings indicated that the students who more often developed their own ideas in conversation and explained their ideas to others achieved better results in those tests.”
  • Individual student talk matters, and vocal participation contributes more than silent participation.

    “Individual student talk matters (see Ing et al., 2015;Larrain et al., 2019;Sedova et al., 2019;Webb et al., 2014), and vocal participation contributes more than silent participation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ing, M., Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. H.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Ing, Marsha
Venue
Educational Studies in Mathematics
Published
2015-08-05
Volume
90
Issue
3
Pages
341-356
ISSN
  • 0013-1954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0816
OpenAlex
W1055149762
Cited by
136
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
21.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Studies in Mathematics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • Institute of Education Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student participation, primary school mathematics, teacher practices, academic performance, classroom discussion, teacher-student relationship, peer engagement, mathematics learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review