Cited by 193Mathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsMathematics Education and Pedagogy

‘Explain to your partner’: teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups

Webb, Noreen M., Franke, Megan L., De, Tondra, Chan, Angela G., Freund, Deanna, Shein, Pat, Melkonian, Doris K.·2009·Cambridge Journal of Education

Abstract

Collaborative group work has great potential to promote student learning, and increasing evidence exists about the kinds of interaction among students that are necessary to achieve this potential. Less often studied is the role of the teacher in promoting effective group collaboration. This article investigates the extent to which teachers' instructional practices were related to small‐group dialogue in four urban elementary mathematics classrooms in the US. Using videotaped and audiotaped recordings of whole‐class and small‐group discussions, we examined the extent to which teachers pressed students to explain their thinking during their interventions with small groups and during whole‐class discussions, and we explored the relationship between teachers' practices and the nature and extent of students' explaining during collaborative group work. While teachers used a variety of instructional practices to structure and orchestrate students' dialogue in small groups, only probing students' explanations to uncover details of their thinking and problem‐solving strategies exhibited a strong relationship with student explaining. Implications for future research, professional development, and teacher education are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/03057640802701986

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Noreen M.
Venue
Cambridge Journal of Education
Published
2009-03
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
49-70
ISSN
  • 0305-764X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-3577
OpenAlex
W2060788913
Cited by
193
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
22.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cambridge Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
collaborative group work, teacher instructional practices, whole-class discussion, mathematics education, urban elementary schools, teacher questioning, problem-solving strategies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review