A constrained least-squares approach to combine bottom-up and top-down CO2 flux estimates
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Satellite-based measurements are providing a new source of atmospheric trace gas data that can be used to estimate land surface fluxes with inverse modeling frameworks.
“Satellite-based measurements are providing a new source of atmospheric trace gas data that can be used to estimate land surface fluxes with inverse modeling frameworks 86,87”
From Climate-smart soils (2016) · cites this paper as [86]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Cooley, D., Breidt, F. J., Ogle, S. M., Schuh, A. E., & Lauvaux, T.
- Affiliations
- Colorado State University (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cooley, Daniel
- Venue
- Environmental and Ecological Statistics
- Published
- 2012-07-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-146
- ISSN
- 1352-8505 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3009
- OpenAlex
- W2141051394
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental and Ecological Statistics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Keywords
- terrestrial CO2 fluxes, constrained least squares, data fusion, uncertainty reduction, temperature inversion, variance weighting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
