The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preventive and curative activity of postharvest potassium silicate treatments to control green and blue molds on orange fruit
Open accessAbstract
Preventive and curative antifungal activities of postharvest treatments with potassium silicate (PSi) against green (GM) and blue (BM) molds were evaluated on oranges (cvs. ‘Valencia’ or ‘Lanelate’) artificially inoculated in rind wounds with Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum, respectively. The most effective PSi concentration, the effect of fungal inoculum concentration, and the influence of temporal and spatial factors on antifungal activity were assessed in in vivo primary screenings. After 6 days of incubation at 20 °C, significant preventive (treatment before fungal inoculation) and curative (treatment after inoculation) activities against GM and BM were observed with PSi at 90 mM (GM and BM incidence reductions of 23 and 52 %, and 23 and 40 %, respectively). In preventive tests, the effectiveness of PSi was influenced by inoculum concentration (10³, 10⁴, 10⁵, or 10⁶spores ml⁻¹), but not by the distance between treatment and inoculation sites (10, 20 or 30 mm). PSi applied about 2 h before inoculation showed higher preventive activity than applied before 24, 48 or 96 h. In order to determine the best dip treatment conditions, PSi at 90 mM was tested at 20 or 50 °C for 60 or 150 s in small-scale trials with ‘Lanelate’ oranges artificially inoculated before or after the treatment and incubated for 7 days at 20 °C. Dips at 20 °C for 60 s were selected and subsequently applied on inoculated ‘Valencia’ oranges stored at 5 °C and 90 % RH for up to 6 weeks. Curative postharvest dips effectively reduced the incidence and severity of both GM and BM during cold storage, while preventive dips significantly reduced the severity but not the incidence. Overall, postharvest PSi treatments showed potential as a new tool to be part of non-polluting strategies to control penicillium decay of citrus fruit.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other GRAS salts with proven curative activity against citrus green and blue molds include sodium benzoate (SB) (Montesinos-Herrero et al., 2016), sodium parabens (Moscoso-Ramírez et al., 2013), and potassium silicate (PSi) (Moscoso-Ramírez and Palou, 2014).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Moscoso-Ramírez and Palou, 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Bi, Y., Tian, S. P., Guo, Y. R., & Ge, Y. H. (2006). Sodium silicate reduces postharvest decay on Hami melons: Induced resistance and fungistatic effects. Plant Disease, 90, 279–283. · DOI
- Buonario, R., Iriti, M., & Romanazzi, G. (2009). Induced resistance to plant diseases caused by oomycetes and fungi. Petria, 19, 130–148.
- Chérif, M., Asselin, A., & Bélanger, R. R. (1994). Defense responses induced by soluble silicon in cucumber roots infected by Phytium spp. Phytopathology, 84, 236–242. · DOI
- Chérif, M., Benhamou, N., Menzies, J. G., & Bélanger, R. R. (1992a). Silicon induced resistance in cucumber plants against Phytium ultimum. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 41, 411–425. · DOI
- Chérif, M., Menzies, J. G., Benhamou, N., & Bélanger, R. R. (1992b). Studies of silicon distribution in wounded and Phytium ultimum infected cucumbers plants. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology, 41, 371–385. · DOI
- Datnoff, L. E., Seebold, K. W., & Correa, V. F. J. (2001). The use of silicon for integrated disease management: reducing fungicide applications and enhancing host plant resistance. In L. E. Datnoff, G. H. Snyder, & G. H. Korndorfer (Eds.), Silicon in agriculture (pp. 171–183). The Netherlands: Elsevier Science. · DOI
- Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. L. (2009). Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biology and Technology, 52, 137–145. · DOI · Paper page
- Eckert, J. W., & Brown, G. E. (1986). Evaluation of postharvest treatments for citrus fruits. In K. D. Hickey (Ed.), Methods for evaluating pesticides for control of plant pathogens (pp. 92–97). St. Paul: American Phytopathological Society Press.
- Eckert, J. W., & Eaks, I. L. (1989). Postharvest disorders and diseases of citrus fruits. In W. Reuter, E. C. Calavan, & G. E. Carman (Eds.), The Citrus Industry (Vol. 5, pp. 179–260). Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Edreva, A. (2004). A novel strategy for plant protection: Induced resistance. Journal of Cell and Molecular Biology, 3, 61–69.
- Epstein, E. (1999). Silicon. Annual Review of Plant Phisiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 50, 641–664. · DOI
- Guo, Y., Liu, L., Zhao, J., & Bi, Y. (2007). Use of silicon oxide and sodium silicate for controlling Trichothecium roseum postharvest rot in Chinese cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L.). International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 42, 1012–1018. · DOI
- Laing, M. D., Gatarayiha, M. C., & Adandonon, A. (2006). Silicon use for pest control in agriculture: A review. Proceedings of the South African Sugar Technologists’ Association, 80, 278–286.
- Liu, J., Zong, Y., Qin, G., Li, B., & Tian, S. (2010). Plasma membrane damage contributes to antifungal activity of silicon against Penicillium digitatum. Current Microbiology, 61, 274–279. · DOI
- Mathaba, N., Tesfay, S., Bower, J. P., & Bertling, I. (2009). The potential of postharvest silicon dips to mitigate chilling injury in citrus fruit with special emphasis on lemon (c.v Eureka). In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Research Day, Silicon in Agriculture. Durban: South African Sugar Association.
- Moscoso-Ramírez, P. A., & Palou, L. (2013). Evaluation of postharvest treatments with chemical resistance inducers to control green and blue molds on orange fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 85, 132–135. · DOI
- O’Neill, T. M. (1991). Investigation of glasshouse structure, growing medium and silicon nutrition as factors affecting disease incidence in cucumber crops. Medelingen van de Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappen, Rijksuniversiteit Gent, 56, 359–367.
- Palou, L., Smilanick, J. L., & Droby, S. (2008). Alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of citrus postharvest green and blue molds. Stewart Postharvest Review, 2(2), 1–16. · DOI · Paper page
- Porat, R., Vinokur, V., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Goldshmidt, E. E., et al. (2003). Induction of resistance to Penicillium digitatum in grapefruit by β-aminobutyric acid. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 109, 901–907. · DOI
- Samuels, A. L., Glass, A. D. M., Ehret, D. L., & Menzies, J. G. (1991). Mobility and deposition of silicon in cucumber plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 14, 485–492. · DOI
- Shen, G. H., Xue, Q. H., Tang, M., Chen, Q., Wang, L. N., Duan, C. M., et al. (2010). Inhibitory effects of potassium silicate on five soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi in vitro. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 117, 180–184. · DOI
- Tian, S., Qin, G., & Xu, Y. (2005). Synergistic effects of combining biocontrol agents with silicon against postharvest diseases of jujube fruit. Journal of Food Protection, 68, 544–550. · DOI
- USDA AMS NOP. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program. (2010). 7 CFR 205.601. Synthetic substances allowed for use in organic crop production. Final rule. Federal Register, 75(238), 77521–77524.
- US EPA. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2006). 40 CFR 180.1268. Potassium silicate; exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. Final rule. Federal Register, 71(114), 34267–34272.
- Vallad, G. E., & Goodman, R. M. (2004). Systemic acquired resistance and induced systemic resistance in conventional agriculture. Crop Science, 44, 1920–1934. · DOI
- Wagner, F. (1940). Die bedeutung der kieselsaüre für das wachstun einiger kulturpflanzen ihren nährstoffhaushalt und ihre anfälligkeit gegen echte mehltaupilze. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, 12, 427–479.
- Youssef, K., Ligorio, A., Sanzani, S. M., Nigro, F., & Ippolito, A. (2012). Control of storage diseases of citrus by pre- and postharvest application of salts. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 72, 57–63. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Moscoso-Ramírez, P. A., & Palou, L.
- Affiliations
- Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (ES)
- Venue
- European Journal of Plant Pathology
- Published
- 2013-11-27
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 721-732
- ISSN
- 0929-1873 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-8469
- OpenAlex
- W2007797486
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 3.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Plant Pathology (publishedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Redivia (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Silicon Effects in Agriculture
- Keywords
- potassium silicate, postharvest treatment, green mold, blue mold, Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, orange fruit, Valencia orange, prophylaxis, curative treatment, dip treatment, cold storage, postharvest decay control, antifungal activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review