Alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of citrus postharvest green and blue moulds
Open accessAbstract
Purpose of review: This article reviews research based on the evaluation of postharvest control methods alternative to conventional chemical fungicides for the control of citrus green and blue moulds, caused by the pathogens Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum, respectively. Emphasis is given to advances developed during the last few years. Potential benefits, disadvantages and commercial feasibility of the application of these methods are discussed. Findings: Substantial progress has been accomplished in selecting and characterising new effective physical, chemical and biological control methods. However, their widespread commercial implementation relies, in general, on the integration of different treatments of the same or different nature in a multifaceted approach. For satisfactory penicillium decay control, this postharvest approach should be part of an integrated disease management (IDM) programme in which preharvest and harvest factors are also considered. Limitations: The lack of either curative or preventive activity, low persistence, high variability, inconsistency or excessive specificity are general limitations associated with the use of alternatives to synthetic fungicides as stand-alone treatments. Furthermore, the risk of adverse effects on fruit quality, technological problems for cost-effective application, or the availability of new conventional fungicides for traditional markets are additional reasons that may hinder the broad commercial use of such treatments. Directions for future research: As we learn more about the fundamental basis underlying host-pathogen interactions and how they are influenced by direct or indirect protective effects of existing or new single alternative treatments, more effective methods of applying and combining complementary approaches for additive or synergistic effects will emerge. Research should provide appropriate tools to tailor the application of these nonpolluting postharvest control systems and, further, the complete IDM strategy for each specific situation (ie, citrus species and cultivar, climatic and seasonal conditions, destination market, etc).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The build-up of single, double, and even triple-resistant isolates in the populations of fungal pathogens in commercial packinghouses seriously compromises the effectiveness of these chemicals.
“The build-up of single, double, and even triple-resistant isolates in the populations of fungal pathogens in commercial packinghouses seriously compromises the effectiveness of these chemicals (Palou et al., 2008).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Palou et al., 2008
Postharvest treatments that have been combined with carbonates include a number of antagonistic biological control agents, curing, UV-C light, different disinfectants or oxidizers, and conventional fungicides such as imazalil (IMZ), pyrimethanil (PYR), or thiabendazole (TBZ) at low doses.
“Besides heating the solutions, postharvest treatments that have been combined with carbonates for this purpose include a number of antagonistic biological control agents, curing, UV-C light, different disinfectants or oxidizers, and conventional fungicides such as imazalil (IMZ), pyrimethanil (PYR), or thiabendazole (TBZ) at low doses (Palou et al., 2008; Dore et al., 2010; Venditti et al., 2010;”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Palou et al., 2008
The continuous use of synthetic fungicides has led in many cases to the proliferation of resistant biotypes of fungal pathogens.
“Furthermore, the continuous use of these synthetic compounds has led in many cases to the proliferation of resistant biotypes of fungal pathogens.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Palou et al., 2008
Additional problems for GRAS salt treatments are lack of regulatory approval for many compounds evaluated in laboratory and disposal issues related to high salinity, sodium content, pH, and conductivity of some salt aqueous solutions.
“Additional problems are the lack of regulatory approval for many compounds evaluated in the laboratory and disposal issues related to high salinity, sodium content, pH, and conductivity of some salt aqueous solutions (Palou et al., 2008; Smilanick et al., 2008).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Palou et al., 2008
Cites
Droby, S., Vinokur, V., Weiss, B., Cohen, L., Daus, A., Goldschmidt, E. E., & Porat, R. (2002) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto.2002.92.4.393 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Self-citationBar-Shimon, M., Yehuda, H., Cohen, L., Weiss, B., Kobeshnikov, A., Daus, A., Goldway, M., Wisniewski, M., & Droby, S. (2004) · Current Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00294-003-0471-7 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Self-citationKarabulut, O. A., Smilanick, J. L., Gabler, F. M., Mansour, M., & Droby, S. (2003) · Plant Disease · doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.11.1384 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Self-citationSegal, E., Yehuda, H., Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., & Goldway, M. (2002) · Yeast · doi:10.1002/yea.910 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm?
Droby, S., Wisniewski, M., Macarisin, D., & Wilson, C. (2009) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Self-citationPalou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Self-citationWaewthongrak, W., Pisuchpen, S., & Leelasuphakul, W. (2015) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.07.016 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Citrus spp .: orange, mandarin, tangerine, clementine, grapefruit, pomelo, lemon and lime
El-Otmani, M., Ait-Oubahou, A., & Zacarías, L. (2011) · Postharvest Biology and Technology of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits · doi:10.1533/9780857092762.437 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Dore, A., Molinu, M. G., Venditti, T., & D’Hallewin, G. (2010) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf101013j · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Palou, L., Smilanick, J. L., & Droby, S.
- Venue
- Stewart Postharvest Review
- Publisher
- Portico
- Published
- 2008
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 1745-9656 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2137244411
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Stewart Postharvest Review (publishedVersion)
- Redivia (Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias (IVIA)) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
- Keywords
- citrus postharvest diseases, green mold, blue mold, Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum, fungicide alternatives, biological control, physical control, integrated disease management, host-pathogen interaction, synergistic therapy, fruit decay control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review