Cited by 128Hydrological Forecasting Using AIWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisWater Quality and Pollution Assessment

Prediction of the five-day biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand in natural streams using machine learning methods

Najafzadeh, Mohammad, Ghaemi, Alireza·2019·Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Abstract

Rivers, as the most prominent component of water resources, have a key role to play in increasing the life expectancy of living creatures. The essential characteristics of water pollutants can be described by water quality indices (WQIs). Hence, a ferocious demand for obtaining an accurate prediction of WQIs is of high importance for perception of pollutant patterns in natural streams. Field studies conducted on different rivers indicated that there is no general relationship to yield water quality parameters with a permissible level of accuracy. Over the past decades, several artificial intelligence (AI) models have been employed to predict more precise estimation of WQIs rather than conventional models. In this way, through the current study, multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS) and least square-support vector machine (LS-SVM), as machine learning methods, were used to predict indices of the five-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5) and chemical oxygen demand (COD). To improve the proposed approaches, 200 series of field data, collected from Karoun River southwest of Iran, pertain to the nine independent input parameters, namely electrical conductivity (EC), sodium (Na+), calcium (Ca 2+), magnesium (Mg 2+), orthophosphate ([Formula: see text]), nitrite ([Formula: see text]), nitrate nitrogen ([Formula: see text]), turbidity, and pH. The performances of the LS-SVM and MARS techniques were quantified in both training and testing stages by means of several statistical parameters. Furthermore, the results of the proposed AI models were compared with those obtained using artificial neural network (ANN), adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and multiple regression equations. Results of the present research work indicated that the proposed artificial intelligence techniques, as machine learning classifiers, were found to be efficient in order to predict water quality parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10661-019-7446-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 128

Authors
Najafzadeh, M., & Ghaemi, A.
Affiliations
Graduate University of Advanced Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Najafzadeh, Mohammad
Venue
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Published
2019-05-19
Volume
191
Issue
6
Pages
380-380
ISSN
  • 0167-6369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2959
OpenAlex
W2945889143
Cited by
128
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Monitoring and Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
Keywords
chemical oxygen demand, water quality index, natural streams, multivariate adaptive regression splines, least squares support vector machine, water quality prediction, water contaminants, artificial neural networks, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Environmental Monitoring, Iran, Regression Analysis, Water Pollutants, Multivariate Analysis, Neural Networks, Computer, Rivers, Biological Oxygen Demand Analysis, Support Vector Machine, Water Quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review