Cited by 127Software Testing and Debugging TechniquesSoftware Engineering ResearchModel-Driven Software Engineering Techniques

Inferring extended finite state machine models from software executions

Open access
Walkinshaw, Neil, Taylor, Ramsay, Derrick, John·2016·Empirical Software Engineering

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10664-015-9367-7

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [9]9. Cesarini F, Thompson S (2011) Erlang by Example. O'Reilly Media
  2. [11]11. Clarke E, Grumberg O, Jha S, Lu Y, Veith H (2000) Counterexampleguided abstraction refinement. In: Computer aided verification, Springer, pp 154-169
  3. [19]19. Freund Y, Schapire R (1995) A desicion-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting. In: Computational learning theory, Springer, pp 23-37
  4. [39]39. Mitchell T (1997) Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walkinshaw, N., Taylor, R., & Derrick, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Walkinshaw, Neil
Venue
Empirical Software Engineering
Published
2015-03-17
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
811-853
ISSN
  • 1382-3256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7616
OpenAlex
W2026252407
Cited by
127
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
54.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Empirical Software Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M017044/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
Keywords
extended finite state machines, reverse engineering, non-determinism, software maintenance, software verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review