The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enjoy your observability: an industrial survey of microservice tracing and analysis
Open accessAbstract
Microservice systems are often deployed in complex cloud-based environments and may involve a large number of service instances being dynamically created and destroyed. It is thus essential to ensure observability to understand these microservice systems' behaviors and troubleshoot their problems. As an important means to achieve the observability, distributed tracing and analysis is known to be challenging. While many companies have started implementing distributed tracing and analysis for microservice systems, it is not clear whether existing approaches fulfill the required observability. In this article, we present our industrial survey on microservice tracing and analysis through interviewing developers and operation engineers of microservice systems from ten companies. Our survey results offer a number of findings. For example, large microservice systems commonly adopt a tracing and analysis pipeline, and the implementations of the pipeline in different companies reflect different tradeoffs among a variety of concerns. Visualization and statistic-based metrics are the most common means for trace analysis, while more advanced analysis techniques such as machine learning and data mining are seldom used. Microservice tracing and analysis is a new big data problem for software engineering, and its practices breed new challenges and opportunities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Trust must be established across the entire distributed diagnostic pipeline, including data collection, causal reasoning, and fault propagation analysis [52,246,248].”
From Anomaly detection and root-cause identification in microservices: a survey (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“However, microservice-based systems are inherently distributed, dynamic, and partially observable, where diagnostic outcomes emerge from the interaction of multiple services, heterogeneous telemetry sources, and continuously evolving system topologies [243,248].”
From Anomaly detection and root-cause identification in microservices: a survey (2026) · cites this paper as [248]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A change may be correct in its final state yet unsafe while it is being applied, so the agent should stage the change, run a canary, validate the result, and only then widen the rollout [11], [73], [41].”
From Large language models for agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, evaluation, and safety (2027) · cites this paper as [73]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“NetOps practitioners assess risk using criteria that align with autonomy decisions, such as the number of affected devices, novelty of the change, the adequacy of verification procedures, and the history of similar changes causing incidents [73], [70], [65].”
From Large language models for agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, evaluation, and safety (2027) · cites this paper as [73]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Transient safety requires every intermediate state to satisfy the relevant invariants: ∀t ∈ [0, T ] : I(x t ) = 1, (25) where I combines the required reachability, isolation, waypointing, and loop-freedom checks.”
From Large language models for agentic NetOps and AIOps: Architectures, evaluation, and safety (2027) · cites this paper as [73]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kvale, S. (2007) · doi:10.4135/9781849208963 · Cited by 2,182
Dapper, a Large-Scale Distributed Systems Tracing Infrastructure
Sigelman, B. H., Barroso, L. A., Burrows, M., Stephenson, P., Plakal, M., Beaver, D., Jaspan, S., & Shanbhag, C. (2010) · Cited by 477
Zhou, X., Peng, X., Xie, T., Sun, J., Ji, C., Li, W., & Ding, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2018.2887384 · Cited by 410
Self-citationResearch on Architecting Microservices: Trends, Focus, and Potential for Industrial Adoption
Francesco, P. D., Malavolta, I., & Lago, P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) · doi:10.1109/icsa.2017.24 · Cited by 315
Zhou, X., Peng, X., Xie, T., Sun, J., Ji, C., Liu, D., Xiang, Q., & He, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3338906.3338961 · Cited by 277
Self-citation(2015) · doi:10.1145/2815400.2815415 · Cited by 202
Characterizing logging practices in open-source software
Yuan, D., Park, S., & Zhou, Y. (2012) · Proceedings/Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/icse.2012.6227202 · Cited by 195
From Monolith to Microservices: A Dataflow-Driven Approach
Chen, R., Li, S., & Li, Z. (2017) · 2017 24th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC) · doi:10.1109/apsec.2017.53 · Cited by 181
Migrating Towards Microservice Architectures: An Industrial Survey
Francesco, P. D., Lago, P., & Malavolta, I. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) · doi:10.1109/icsa.2018.00012 · Cited by 178
(2017) · doi:10.1145/3132747.3132749 · Cited by 144
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Barham P., Donnelly A., Isaacs R., Mortier R. (2004) Using Magpie for request extraction and workload modelling. In: 6Th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI), pp 259–272
- Barham P., Isaacs R., Mortier R., Narayanan D. (2003) Magpie: Online modelling and performance-aware systems. In: 9Th workshop on hot topics in operating systems (hotOS), pp 85–90
- Chen M. Y., Accardi A. J., Kiciman E., Patterson D. A., Fox A., Brewer E. A. (2004) Path-based failure and evolution management. In: 1St symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), pp 309–322
- Fonseca R., Dutta P., Levis P., Stoica I. (2008) Quanto: Tracking energy in networked embedded systems. In: 8Th USENIX symposium on operating systems design and implementation (OSDI), pp 323–338
- Fonseca R., Freedman M., Porter G. (2010) Experiences with tracing causality in networked services. In: 1St internet network management workshop/workshop on research on enterprise monitoring
- Fonseca R., Porter G., Katz R. H., Shenker S., Stoica I. (2007) X-trace: A pervasive network tracing framework. In: 4Th symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), pp 271–284
- Reynolds P., Killian C., Wiener J., Mogul J., Shah M., Vahdat A. (2006) Pip: Detecting the unexpected in distributed systems. In: 3Rd symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI), pp 115–128
- Strauss A., Corbin J. (1990) Open coding. In: Strauss A, Corbin J (eds) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, London, pp 101–121
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Robust Failure Diagnosis of Microservice System Through Multimodal Data
Zhang, S., Jin, P., Lin, Z., Sun, Y., Zhang, B., Xia, S., Li, Z., Zhong, Z., Ma, M., Jin, W., et al. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2023.3290018 · Cited by 118
Toward the Observability of Cloud-Native Applications: The Overview of the State-of-the-Art
Kosińska, J., Baliś, B., Konieczny, M., Malawski, M., & Zieliński, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3281860 · Cited by 63
Failure Diagnosis in Microservice Systems: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis
Zhang, S., Xia, S., Fan, W., Shi, B., Xiong, X., Zhong, Z., Ma, M., Sun, Y., & Pei, D. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3715005 · Cited by 57
TraceGra: A trace-based anomaly detection for microservice using graph deep learning
Chen, J., Liu, F., Jiang, J., Zhong, G., Xu, D., Tan, Z., & Shi, S. (2023) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2023.03.028 · Cited by 55
Panahandeh, M., Hamou-Lhadj, A., Hamdaqa, M., & Miller, J. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111917 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, B., Peng, X., Xiang, Q., Wang, H., Xie, T., Sun, J., & Liu, X.
- Affiliations
- Fudan University (CN)
- eBay (United States) (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Singapore Management University (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Peng, Xin
- Venue
- Empirical Software Engineering
- Published
- 2021-11-30
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-25
- ISSN
- 1382-3256 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7616
- PMC
- PMC8629732
- OpenAlex
- W3216137074
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13
- FWCI
- 6.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Empirical Software Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1004803)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- microservices, distributed tracing, trace analysis, observability, trace visualization, cloud systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
