Cited by 49Software System Performance and ReliabilitySoftware Testing and Debugging TechniquesAnomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

ServiceAnomaly: An anomaly detection approach in microservices using distributed traces and profiling metrics

Open access
Panahandeh, Mahsa, Hamou-Lhadj, Abdelwahab, Hamdaqa, Mohammad, Miller, James·2024·Journal of Systems and Software

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2023.111917

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • State-of-the-art anomaly detection solutions for microservice applications assume the application topology remains static over time and fail to account for dynamic changes in the application and its infrastructure.

    “Nevertheless, state-of-the-art solutions assume the topology of the monitored application to remain static over time and fail to account for the dynamic changes the application, and the infrastructure it is deployed on, undergoes.”
  • All related work in the domain evaluates their methodologies under varying user load, but the topology of the application is always assumed to be static.

    “As explicitly pointed out by ServiceAnomaly [29], all related work in the domain evaluates their methodologies under varying user load, but the topology of the application is always assumed to be static.”
  • ServiceAnomaly combines distributed traces and resource metric monitoring data into a Control Flow Graph, but this method is intrusive, and the constructed CFGs are limited to application layer dependencies and do not encompass metrics captured at the infrastructure layer.

    “ServiceAnomaly [29] tackles this by combining distributed traces and resource metric monitoring data into a CFG. This method, however, is once again intrusive. Furthermore, the constructed CFGs are limited to the application layer dependencies and do not encompass metrics captured at the infrastructure layer.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panahandeh, M., Hamou-Lhadj, A., Hamdaqa, M., & Miller, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Polytechnique Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Panahandeh, Mahsa
Venue
Journal of Systems and Software
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
209
Pages
111917
ISSN
0164-1212 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389752973
Cited by
49
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 7
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Systems and Software (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Keywords
anomaly detection, microservices, context propagation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review