Cited by 263Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationRetirement, Disability, and Employment

Perspectives on Disability Disclosure: The Importance of Employer Practices and Workplace Climate

Open access
von Schrader, Sarah, Malzer, Valerie, Bruyère, Susanne·2014·Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Abstract

Disclosing a disability to a potential or current employer is a very personal decision, with potentially far-reaching consequences for both the employer and employee. Disability disclosure can assure that employees receive appropriate workplace accommodations, and can help employers respond more effectively to diversity and inclusion initiatives aimed at increasing the hiring and retention of individuals with disabilities. However, disclosure may also result in negative employment consequences for employees, such as lowered supervisor expectations, isolation from co-workers, and increased likelihood of termination. Given demographic trends related to disability in the labor force and recent initiatives to increase the employment of individuals with disabilities, it is increasingly important that employers create an environment that encourages disclosure and reduces the likelihood of negative consequences for employees and applicants who disclose their disabilities. This paper presents the findings of a survey of individuals with disabilities focused on identifying and better understanding the factors that influence the disclosure decision. Results highlight the barriers and facilitators that influence individuals’ decision to disclose and the important role that employers, managers, and workplace climate play in the decision. Implications for employer policy and practice are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10672-013-9227-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
von Schrader, S., Malzer, V., & Bruyère, S.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Published
2013-07-20
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
237-255
ISSN
  • 0892-7545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3378
OpenAlex
W2014099480
Cited by
263
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (H133B040013)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
Keywords
disability disclosure, workplace accommodations, organizational climate, organizational practices, people with disabilities, employment effects, diversity and inclusion, employee retention, employer policies, supervisor expectations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review