Perspectives on Disability Disclosure: The Importance of Employer Practices and Workplace Climate
Open accessAbstract
Disclosing a disability to a potential or current employer is a very personal decision, with potentially far-reaching consequences for both the employer and employee. Disability disclosure can assure that employees receive appropriate workplace accommodations, and can help employers respond more effectively to diversity and inclusion initiatives aimed at increasing the hiring and retention of individuals with disabilities. However, disclosure may also result in negative employment consequences for employees, such as lowered supervisor expectations, isolation from co-workers, and increased likelihood of termination. Given demographic trends related to disability in the labor force and recent initiatives to increase the employment of individuals with disabilities, it is increasingly important that employers create an environment that encourages disclosure and reduces the likelihood of negative consequences for employees and applicants who disclose their disabilities. This paper presents the findings of a survey of individuals with disabilities focused on identifying and better understanding the factors that influence the disclosure decision. Results highlight the barriers and facilitators that influence individuals’ decision to disclose and the important role that employers, managers, and workplace climate play in the decision. Implications for employer policy and practice are also discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decision whether to disclose, when to disclose, and to whom to disclose is deeply personal and is more difficult if one's condition is stigmatized.
“The decision whether to disclose, when to disclose, and to whom to disclose is deeply personal (Jans et al., 2012; Von Schrader, Malzer, & Bruyère, 2014), and it is more difficult if one’s condition is stigmatized (e.g., HIV/AIDS; Ragins, 2008).”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Von Schrader, Malzer, & Bruyère, 2014
People with disabilities are often advised against disclosing in the early stages of the employment relationship and to either disclose after an employment offer or not at all until accommodations are needed.
“Thus, people with disabilities are often advised against disclosing in the early stages of the employment relationship (e.g., the interview) and to either disclose after an employment offer or not at all until accommodations are needed”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Von Schrader et al., 2014
The presence of employee resource groups was a facilitator of disclosure, especially among employees with less apparent disabilities.
“Of note, Von Schrader et al. (2014) found that the presence of employee resource groups was a facilitator of disclosure, especially among employees with less apparent disabilities.”
From The Participation of People with Disabilities in the Workplace Across the Employment Cycle: Employer Concerns and Research Evidence (2020) · cites this paper as Von Schrader et al. (2014)
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Employer benefits from making workplace accommodations
Solovieva, T. I., Dowler, D. L., & Walls, R. T. (2011) · Disability and Health Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.03.001 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neurodiversity at work: a biopsychosocial model and the impact on working adults
Doyle, N. (2020) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldaa021 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Bonaccio, S., Connelly, C. E., Gellatly, I. R., Jetha, A., & Martin Ginis, K. A. (2020) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-018-9602-5 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Disability in the Workplace: A Unique and Variable Identity
Santuzzi, A. M., & Waltz, P. R. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206315626269 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Considerations for AI fairness for people with disabilities
Trewin, S., Basson, S., Muller, M., Branham, S., Treviranus, J., Gruen, D., Hebert, D., Lyckowski, N., & Manser, E. (2019) · AI Matters · doi:10.1145/3362077.3362086 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
- Authors
- von Schrader, S., Malzer, V., & Bruyère, S.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- ORCID
- Bruyère, Susanne
- Venue
- Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
- Published
- 2013-07-20
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 237-255
- ISSN
- 0892-7545 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3378
- OpenAlex
- W2014099480
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Australian Government
- National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (H133B040013)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
- Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
- Keywords
- disability disclosure, workplace accommodations, organizational climate, organizational practices, people with disabilities, employment effects, diversity and inclusion, employee retention, employer policies, supervisor expectations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review