The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self-exposure and exposure of the self: informational privacy and the presentation of identity
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, Shoemaker (2010) argues that it is not possible to disentangle moral aspects of private data management from the issues of self-determination and identity, given the changing nature of identity formation in the digitalised world defined by the ubiquitous collection of private data.”
From Sovereignty, privacy, and ethics in blockchain-based identity management systems (2021) · cites this paper as Shoemaker (2010)
In the citing paper
“The key issue here is that a singular identity persistent across the range of contexts, is not always morally desirable, and not all context of identification require such identity (Shoemaker 2010).”
From Sovereignty, privacy, and ethics in blockchain-based identity management systems (2021) · cites this paper as Shoemaker 2010
In the citing paper
“Shoemaker (2010) arguing against such strong ontological interpretation of informational identity, nevertheless also suggests that the right to informational privacy is also a right to control or manage the presentation of one’s self-identity: a right to manage certain public construals of one’s self-identity, or at least to have a say in determining how one’s identity is interpreted by others.”
From Sovereignty, privacy, and ethics in blockchain-based identity management systems (2021) · cites this paper as Shoemaker 2010
Citations
Cites
Korsgaard, C. M., & O'Neill, O. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511554476 · Cited by 4,013
Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition.
Taylor, C. (1994) · Cited by 3,097
The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays
Frankfurt, H. G. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818172 · Cited by 2,634
Taylor, C. (1995) · Multiculturalism · doi:10.1515/9781400821402-004 · Cited by 2,452
TAYLOR, C. (1994) · Multiculturalism · doi:10.2307/j.ctt7snkj.6 · Cited by 2,042
Westin, A. F. (1967) · Cited by 1,908
Westin, A. F. (1970) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,861
The Possibility of Practical Reason
Velleman, J. D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198238256.001.0001 · Cited by 1,241
The importance of what we care about
Frankfurt, H. (1982) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/bf00484902 · Cited by 1,097
Frankfurt, H. G. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624643 · Cited by 901
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Beardsley, E. (1971). Privacy: Autonomy and selective disclosure. In J. Roland Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Nomos XIII: Privacy (pp. 56–70). New York: Atherton Press.
Cited by
AI Technologies, Privacy, and Security
Elliott, D., & Soifer, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.826737 · Cited by 208
Paechter, C. (2012) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794112446107 · Cited by 175
Reviewing person's value of privacy of online social networking
Hugl, U. (2011) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241111158290 · Cited by 69
Sovereignty, privacy, and ethics in blockchain-based identity management systems
Ishmaev, G. (2021) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-020-09563-x · Cited by 53
“The key issue here is that a singular identity persistent across the range of contexts, is not always morally desirable, and not all context of identification require such identity (Shoemaker 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialContemporary Privacy Theory Contributions to Learning Analytics
Heath, J. A. (2014) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2014.11.8 · Cited by 47
Fors, K. L. (2017) · Law, governance and technology series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-48342-9_7 · Cited by 46
Batchelor, R., Bobrowicz, A., Mackenzie, R., & Milne, A. J. (2012) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9286-x · Cited by 46
Practical versus moral identities in identity management
Manders-Huits, N. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-010-9216-8 · Cited by 31
Negotiating Privacy Through Phatic Communication. A Case Study of the Blogging Self
Lomborg, S. (2011) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-011-0018-7 · Cited by 24
Data autonomy and privacy in the smart home: the case for a privacy smart home meta-assistant
Orlowski, A., & Loh, W. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02182-4 · Cited by 16
Privacy and Human-AI Relationships
Register, C., Khan, M. A., Giubilini, A., Earp, B. D., & Savulescu, J. (2025) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-025-00978-2 · Cited by 16
Ensuring Security of Data and Information Flow in Emergency Response Decision Support
Jackson, D., & Hayes, P. (2016) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1109/ares.2016.49 · Cited by 16
Awareness of Indirect Information Disclosure on Social Network Sites
Padyab, A. M., Päivärinta, T., Ståhlbröst, A., & Bergvall‐Kåreborn, B. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118824199 · Cited by 14
Smith, C. H. (2020) · Philosophical studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_3 · Cited by 12
Buitelaar, J. C. (2012) · German Law Journal · doi:10.1017/s2071832200020460 · Cited by 10
How Personal is Machine Learning Personalization?Preprint
Greene, T., & Galit Shmueli, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.07938 · Cited by 9
Identity as convention: biometric passports and the promise of security
Behrensen, M. (2014) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-08-2013-0029 · Cited by 6
Identity Management Systems: Singular Identities and Multiple Moral Issues
Ishmaev, G., & Stokkink, Q. (2020) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2020.00015 · Cited by 6
Carruth, A. D., & Hill, D. W. (2015) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-015-9364-y · Cited by 5
A privacy framework for secondary use of medical data
Heath, J. A. (2013) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas.2013.6613116 · Cited by 4
Beyond Our Behavior: The GDPR and Humanistic PersonalizationPreprint
Greene, T., & Galit Shmueli, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.13404 · Cited by 4
User Perceptions of Information Security: Evidence from Takoradi Technical University
Agyemang, O., Mensah, R. O., & Asare, E. (2022) · Journal of International Cooperation and Development · doi:10.36941/jicd-2022-0011 · Cited by 3
Thompson, C. J., & Havard, B. (2014) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5888-2.ch649 · Cited by 2
Incorporating ‘Fashion Identity’ Into the Right to Privacy
Onitiu, D. (2022) · Law Technology and Humans · doi:10.5204/lthj.2280 · Cited by 2
Data Science and Designing for Privacy
Falgoust, M. (2016) · Techné Research in Philosophy and Technology · doi:10.5840/techne201632446 · Cited by 1
Hermeziu, C. (2022) · Swedish Journal of Romanian Studies · doi:10.35824/sjrs.v5i1.23884 · Cited by 1
Open Sourcing Normative Assumptions on Privacy and Other Moral Values in Blockchain Applications
Ishmaev, G. (2019) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · doi:10.4233/uuid:ae329b13-9def-478e-8a92-300b21560981 · Cited by 1
Wälter, J. (2021) · TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) · doi:10.26083/tuprints-00017896 · Cited by 1
The Virtuous Journalist, an Updated View. A Study in the Ethics of Journalism
Heino, K. (2012) · UTUPub (University of Turku) · Cited by 1
Gryz, J. (2014)
Facebook, friendship and faith : connecting practices of young adult Christians
Landuyt, V., & Cathryn, A. (2014) · St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository)
The value required to negate consumer privacy concerns around location
Rosenberg, D. P. (2013) · UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)
Privacy for Sale?: Analysis of Online User Privacy
Sørensen, L. T., Sørensen, J. K., & Khajuria, S. (2015) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)
Gryz, J. (2017) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation)
Smith, C. H. (2020) · Philosophical studies series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50585-1_13
Metadata
- Authors
- Shoemaker, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Bowling Green State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shoemaker, David W.
- Venue
- Ethics and Information Technology
- Published
- 2009-04-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-15
- ISSN
- 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-8439
- OpenAlex
- W2011568578
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
- Keywords
- self-exposure, informational privacy, identity presentation, self-disclosure, privacy, identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
