Cited by 31Foucault, Power, and EthicsCultural Studies and PostmodernismEthics and Social Impacts of AI

Black and white transparency: contradictions of a moral metaphor

Open access
Menéndez-Viso, Armando·2009·Ethics and Information Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10676-009-9194-x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menéndez-Viso, A.
Venue
Ethics and Information Technology
Published
2009-05-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
155-162
ISSN
  • 1388-1957 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8439
OpenAlex
W2107862431
Cited by
31
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Ethics and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of Exeter
  • Universidad de Oviedo
  • Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Foucault, Power, and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
transparency, moral metaphor, opacity, Plato, corporate transparency, government transparency, information technology, reporting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review