The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Informational Barriers to Entry into Credit Markets
Open accessAbstract
Economic theory suggests that asymmetric information between incumbents and entrants can generate barriers to entry into credit markets. Incumbents have superior information about their own customers and the overall economic conditions of the local credit market. This implies that entrants are likely to experience higher loan default rates than the incumbents. We test these theoretical predictions using a unique database of 7,275 observations on 729 individual banks' lending in 95 Italian local markets. We find that informational asymmetries play a significant role in explaining entrants' loan default rates. The default rate is significantly higher for those banks that entered local markets without opening a branch, suggesting that having a branch on site may help to reduce the informational disadvantage. We also uncover a positive correlation between banks' loan default rates in individual local markets and the number of banks lending in that market. We argue that these informational barriers can help to explain why entry into many local credit markets by domestic and foreign banks was slow, even after substantial deregulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information
Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8v12ft1 · Cited by 12,769
The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships
Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118445 · Cited by 3,294
Can Relationship Banking Survive Competition?
Boot, A. W. A., & Thakor, A. V. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00223 · Cited by 1,590
Competition, Adverse Selection, and Information Dispersion in the Banking Industry: Table 1
Marquez, R. (2002) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/15.3.901 · Cited by 417
Cited by
POLITICIANS AT WORK: THE PRIVATE RETURNS AND SOCIAL COSTS OF POLITICAL CONNECTIONS
Cingano, F., & Pinotti, P. (2013) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1111/jeea.12001 · Cited by 561
Banks and innovation: Microeconometric evidence on Italian firms☆
BENFRATELLO, L., SCHIANTARELLI, F., & SEMBENELLI, A. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.01.001 · Cited by 554
PORTFOLIO SELECTION WITH MONOTONE MEAN‐VARIANCE PREFERENCES
Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A., & Taboga, M. (2009) · Mathematical Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9965.2009.00376.x · Cited by 426
The financing of small innovative firms: the Italian case
Magri, S. (2009) · Economics of Innovation and New Technology · doi:10.1080/10438590701738016 · Cited by 409
What do we know about entrepreneurial finance and its relationship with growth?
Fraser, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Wright, M. (2015) · International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1177/0266242614547827 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Bofondi, M., & Gobbi, G.
- Venue
- Review of Finance
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 39-67
- ISSN
- 1382-6662 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-692X
- 1572-3097
- OpenAlex
- W2098105941
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 66.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Informational Barriers to Entry into Credit Markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10679-006-6978-2
- The paper
- Bofondi, M., & Gobbi, G. (2006). Informational Barriers to Entry into Credit Markets. Review of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10679-006-6978-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.