Quantum Black Holes as Solvents
Open accessAbstract
Almost all of the entropy in the universe is in the form of Bekenstein–Hawking (BH) entropy of super-massive black holes. This entropy, if it satisfies Boltzmann’s equation $$S=\log \mathcal{N}$$ S = log N , hence represents almost all the accessible phase space of the Universe, somehow associated to objects which themselves fill out a very small fraction of ordinary three-dimensional space. Although time scales are very long, it is believed that black holes will eventually evaporate by emitting Hawking radiation, which is thermal when counted mode by mode. A pure quantum state collapsing to a black hole will hence eventually re-emerge as a state with strictly positive entropy, which constitutes the famous black hole information paradox. Expanding on a remark by Hawking we posit that BH entropy is a thermodynamic entropy, which must be distinguished from information-theoretic entropy. The paradox can then be explained by information return in Hawking radiation. The novel perspective advanced here is that if BH entropy counts the number of accessible physical states in a quantum black hole, then the paradox can be seen as an instance of the fundamental problem of statistical mechanics. We suggest a specific analogy to the increase of the entropy in a solvation process. We further show that the huge phase volume ($$\mathcal{N}$$ N ), which must be made available to the universe in a gravitational collapse, cannot originate from the entanglement between ordinary matter and/or radiation inside and outside the black hole. We argue that, instead, the quantum degrees of freedom of the gravitational field must get activated near the singularity, resulting in a final state of the ‘entangled entanglement’ form involving both matter and gravity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy can be interpreted as von Neumann entropy measuring the entanglement of matter with the quantum gravitational degrees of freedom.
“In [30] we argued that the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy can be interpreted as von Neumann entropy measuring the entanglement of matter with the (quantum) gravitational degrees of freedom.”
From Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
Gravitational collapse activates a huge number of new quantum gravitational degrees of freedom, with dimension dim H_G ≈ e^{4π(m/m_Pl)^2}.
“The price to pay is that the gravitational collapse activates a huge number of new degrees of freedom”
From Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information (2023) · cites this paper as [30]
Cites
Information in black hole radiation
Page, D. N. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.3743 · Cited by 1,172 · see citing works
Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory
Susskind, L., & Uglum, J. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.50.2700 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Time dependence of Hawking radiation entropy
Page, D. N. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/09/028 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
A LARGER ESTIMATE OF THE ENTROPY OF THE UNIVERSE
Egan, C. A., & Lineweaver, C. H. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/710/2/1825 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
The black hole information problem: past, present, and future
Marolf, D. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa77cc · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conformal Cyclic Cosmology, gravitational entropy and quantum information
Eckstein, M. (2023) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03070-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Aurell, E., Eckstein, M., & Horodecki, P.
- Affiliations
- Jagiellonian University (PL)
- Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
- Corresponding author
- Eckstein, Michał
- Venue
- Foundations of Physics
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0015-9018 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9516
- OpenAlex
- W2994631323
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Foundations of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (2018/MAB/5, POIR.04.04.00-00-17C1/18-00)
- Narodowe Centrum Nauki (2017/24/C/ST2/00322)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
- Keywords
- black hole information paradox, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Hawking radiation, quantum black holes, black hole evaporation, phase space volume, gravitational collapse, entanglement, quantum gravity, information returns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review