Cited by 259Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant Growth and Agriculture Techniques

The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review

Open access
Chen, Yongshan, Camps-Arbestain, Marta, Shen, Qinhua, Singh, Balwant, Cayuela, Maria Luz·2018·Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems

Abstract

An exhaustive meta-analysis of 132 long-term (≥ 10 years) studies worldwide was carried out to determine the effects of the use of organic amendments (OA) and OA + inorganic fertiliser (IF) on soil nutrient fertility. The responses of (1) crop yield [over the whole duration of the period (yield m ) and at the end of the experiment (yield f )], (2) soil organic carbon (OC), (3) size of microbial biomass, and (4) Olsen phosphorus (P) to OA and OA + IF compared with IF only ( standard control ) and no fertilisation ( nil control ) were investigated. The overall effect of OA alone on yield was significant when compared with the nil control , but not when compared with the standard control . Only when OA and IF were added to soils that met specific conditions (low initial fertility, sandy texture, near-neutral pH values, under tropical climate) they rendered a significantly greater yield f than the corresponding standard controls . The continuous application of manure caused greater relative and absolute gains in soil OC than straw + IF but did not produce significant greater yields while causing a considerable increase in Olsen P over time. The use of OA and OA + IF increased the resilience of agronomic systems over that of IF alone, as inferred from the smaller coefficient of variation of crop yield over time. We conclude that while the use of OA along with IF provides some additional benefits on yields as compared with IF application alone (especially under the above-mentioned conditions), the selection of the OA type and application rate should be carefully considered in order to maximise the nutrient use efficiency and minimise any undesirable effects to the environment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10705-017-9903-5

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, Y., Camps-Arbestain, M., Shen, Q., Singh, B., & Cayuela, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Quanzhou Normal University (CN)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
111
Issue
2-3
Pages
103-125
ISSN
  • 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0867
OpenAlex
W2782195536
Cited by
259
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Chinese Scholarship Council
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CTM2015–67200–R)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
Keywords
organic amendments, long-term fertilization, crop yield, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, Olsen phosphorus, manure, straw, mineral fertilizers, nutrient use efficiency, yield variability, soil resilience, tropical soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review