The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review
Open accessAbstract
An exhaustive meta-analysis of 132 long-term (≥ 10 years) studies worldwide was carried out to determine the effects of the use of organic amendments (OA) and OA + inorganic fertiliser (IF) on soil nutrient fertility. The responses of (1) crop yield [over the whole duration of the period (yield m ) and at the end of the experiment (yield f )], (2) soil organic carbon (OC), (3) size of microbial biomass, and (4) Olsen phosphorus (P) to OA and OA + IF compared with IF only ( standard control ) and no fertilisation ( nil control ) were investigated. The overall effect of OA alone on yield was significant when compared with the nil control , but not when compared with the standard control . Only when OA and IF were added to soils that met specific conditions (low initial fertility, sandy texture, near-neutral pH values, under tropical climate) they rendered a significantly greater yield f than the corresponding standard controls . The continuous application of manure caused greater relative and absolute gains in soil OC than straw + IF but did not produce significant greater yields while causing a considerable increase in Olsen P over time. The use of OA and OA + IF increased the resilience of agronomic systems over that of IF alone, as inferred from the smaller coefficient of variation of crop yield over time. We conclude that while the use of OA along with IF provides some additional benefits on yields as compared with IF application alone (especially under the above-mentioned conditions), the selection of the OA type and application rate should be carefully considered in order to maximise the nutrient use efficiency and minimise any undesirable effects to the environment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Losses of soil organic matter were observed in arable fields that received no organic amendments.
“Regarding SOM, a general need for the application of OAs to agricultural soils is given, since losses of SOM were observed in arable fields that received no OAs (Kätterer et al., 2011;Maltas et al., 2018;Chen et al., 2018).”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2018
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · see citing works
Biochar's role in mitigating soil nitrous oxide emissions: A review and meta-analysis
Cayuela, M. L., van Zwieten, L., Singh, B. P., Jeffery, S., Roig, A., & Sánchez-Monedero, M. A. (2014) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2013.10.009 · Cited by 1,053 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multifunctional applications of biochar beyond carbon storage
Bolan, N., Hoang, S. A., Beiyuan, J., Gupta, S., Hou, D., Karakoti, A., Joseph, S., Jung, S., Kim, K.-H., Kirkham, M. B., et al. (2022) · International Materials Reviews · doi:10.1080/09506608.2021.1922047 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Self-citationSiedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E. C., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., & van Dongen, J. T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Ye, L., Camps‐Arbestain, M., Shen, Q., Lehmann, J., Singh, B., & Sabir, M. (2020) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12546 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Self-citationRestoration of Soil Quality Using Biochar and Brown Coal Waste: A Review
Amoah-Antwi, C., Kwiatkowska-Malina, J., Thornton, S. F., Fenton, O., Malina, G., & Szara, E. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137852 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, Y., Camps-Arbestain, M., Shen, Q., Singh, B., & Cayuela, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Quanzhou Normal University (CN)
- Massey University (NZ)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Venue
- Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
- Published
- 2018-01-04
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 103-125
- ISSN
- 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0867
- OpenAlex
- W2782195536
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Chinese Scholarship Council
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CTM2015–67200–R)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Keywords
- organic amendments, long-term fertilization, crop yield, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass, Olsen phosphorus, manure, straw, mineral fertilizers, nutrient use efficiency, yield variability, soil resilience, tropical soils
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review