The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Quantifying the prevalence of (non)-response to fertilizers in sub-Saharan Africa using on-farm trial data
Open accessAbstract
Poor and variable crop responses to fertilizer applications constitute a production risk and may pose a barrier to fertilizer adoption in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Attempts to measure response variability and quantify the prevalence of non-response empirically are complicated by the fact that data from on-farm fertilizer trials generally include diverse nutrients and do not include on-site replications. The first aspect limits the extent to which different studies can be combined and compared, while the second does not allow to distinguish actual field-level response variability from experimental error and other residual variations. In this study, we assembled datasets from 41 on-farm fertilizer response trials on cereals and legumes across 11 countries, representing different nutrient applications, to assess response variability and quantify the frequency of occurrence of non-response to fertilizers. Using two approaches to account for residual variation, we estimated non-response, defined here as a zero agronomic response to fertilizer in a given year, to be relatively rare, affecting 0–1 and 7–16% of fields on average for cereals and legumes respectively. The magnitude of response could not be explained by climatic and selected topsoil variables, suggesting that much of the observed variation may relate to unpredictable seasonal and/or local conditions. This implies that, despite demonstrable spatial bias in our sample of trials, the estimated proportion of non-response may be representative for other agro-ecologies across SSA. Under the latter assumption, we estimated that roughly 260,000 ha of cereals and 3,240,000 ha of legumes could be expected to be non-responsive in any particular year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- Adiele JG, Schut AGT, van den Bueken RPM, Ezui KS, Pypers P, Ano AO, Egesi CN, Giller KE (2020) Towards closing cassava yield gap in West Africa: agronomic efficiency and storage root yield responses to NPK fertilizers. Field Crop Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107820 · DOI
- Adjei-Nsiah S, Alabi BU, Ahiakpa JK, Kanampiu F (2018) Response of grain legumes to phosphorus application in the Guinea Savanna Agro-Ecological zones of Ghana. Agron J 110:1089 · DOI
- Andriesse W, Giller K (2015) The state of soil fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric Dev 24:32–36
- Bielders CL, Gérard B (2015) Millet response to microdose fertilization in south-western Niger: effect of antecedent fertility management and environmental factors. Field Crops Res 171:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.10.008 · DOI
- Binswanger-Mkhize HP, Savastano S (2017) Agricultural intensification: the status in six African countries. Food Policy 67:26–40 · DOI
- Bonilla Cedrez C, Chamberlin J, Guo Z, Hijmans RJ (2020) Spatial variation in fertilizer prices in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.Pone.,0227764 · DOI
- Breiman L, Random F (2001) Machine learning 45: 5–32 · DOI · Paper page
- Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 37:4302–4315 · DOI · Paper page
- Garba M, Serme I, Wortmann CS (2018) Crop yield response to fertilizer relative to soil properties in sub-Saharan Africa. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 82:862–870 · DOI
- Greenwood DJ, Wood JT, Cleaver TJ, Hunt J (1971) A theory for fertilizer response. J Agric Sci 77:511–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600064595 · DOI
- Henderson CR (1982) Analysis of covariance in the mixed model: higher-level, nonhomogeneous, and random regressions. Biometrics 38:623. https://doi.org/10.2307/2530044 · DOI
- Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Kempen B, Leenaars JGB, Walsh MG, Shepherd KD, Sila A, MacMillan RA, Mendes de Jesus J, Tamene L, Tondoh JE (2015) Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS ONE 10:e0125814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125814 · DOI
- Hengl T, Leenaars JGB, Shepherd KD, Walsh MG, Heuvelink GBM, Mamo T, Tilahun H, Berkhout E, Cooper M, Fegraus E, Wheeler I, Kwabena NA (2017) Soil nutrient maps of Sub-Saharan Africa: assessment of soil nutrient content at 250 m spatial resolution using machine learning. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 109:77–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9870-x · DOI
- Holden AT (2018) Fertilizer and sustainable intensification in Sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Food Secur 18:20–26 · DOI
- Hutton CE, Robertson WK, Hanson WD (1956) Crop response to different soil fertility levels in a 5 by 5 by 5 by 2 factorial experiment: I. Corn 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 20:531–537 · DOI
- Ichami SM, Shepherd KD, Sila AM, Stoorvogel JJ, Hoffland E (2019) Fertilizer response and nitrogen use efficiency in African smallholder maize farms. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 113:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9958-y · DOI
- IFDC (2006) Africa Fertilizer Summit Proceedings, Abuja, Nigeria June 9–13 2006. Florence, Alabama, IFDC
- Janssen BH (1998) Efficiency use of nutrients: an art of balancing. Field Crops Res 56:197–201 · DOI
- Janssen BH (2011) Simple models and concepts as tools for the study of sustained soil productivity in long term experiments II: crop nutrient equivalents, balanced supplies of available nutrients and NPK triangles. Plant Soil 339:17–33 · DOI
- Janssen BH, Guiking FCT, van der Eijk D, Smalling EMA, Wolf J, van Reuler H (1990) A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils (QUEFTS). Geoderma 46:299–318 · DOI
- Jayne TS, Rachid S (2013) Input subsidy programs in sub-Saharan Africa: a synthesis of recent evidence. Agric Econ 44:547–562 · DOI
- Jayne TS, Mason NM, Burke WJ, Ariga J (2018) Review: taking stock of Africa’s second-generation agricultural input subsidy programs. Food Policy 75:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaizzi KC, Byalebeka J, Semalulu O, Alou I, Zimwanguyizza W, Nansamba A, Musinguzi P, Ebanyat P, Hyuha T, Wortmann CS (2012) Maize response to fertilizer and nitrogen use efficiency in Uganda. Agron J 104:73–82 · DOI
- Kamanga BCG, Waddington SR, Whitbread AM, Almekinders CJM, Giller KE (2014) Improving the efficiency of use of small amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus fertiliser on smallholder maize in central Malawi. Exp Agr 50:229–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479713000513 · DOI
- Kihara J, Nziguheba G, Zingore S, Coulibaly A, Esilaba A, Kabambe V, Njoroge S, Palm C, Huising J (2016) Understanding variability in crop response to fertilizer and amendments in sub-Saharan Africa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 229:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
- Liverpool-Tasie LSO, Omonona BT, Sanou A, Ogunleye WO (2017) Is increasing inorganic fertilizer use for maize production in sub-Saharan Africa a profitable proposition? Evidence from Nigeria. Food Policy 67:41–51 · DOI
- Mafongoya PL, Bationo A, Kihara J, Waswa BS (2007) Appropriate technologies to replenish soil fertility in southern Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 76:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-006-9049-3 · DOI
- Ngome AF, Becker M, Mtei MK, Mussgnug F (2013) Maize productivity and nutrient use efficiency in Western Kenya as affected by soil type and crop management. Int J Plant Product 7:517–536
- Njoroge S, Schut AGT, Giller KE, Zingore S (2017) Strong spatial-temporal patterns in maize yield response to nutrient additions in African smallholder farms. Field Crops Res 214:321–330 · DOI · Paper page
- Olk DC, Cassman KG, Simbahan G, Cruz PCS, Abdulrachman S, Nagarajan R, Tan PS, Satawathananont S (1999) Interpreting fertilizer use efficiency in relation to soil nutrient supplying capacity, factor productivity and agronomic efficiency. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyt 53:35–41 · DOI
- Ronner E, Franke AC, Vanlauwe B, Dianda M, Edeh E, Ekem B, Bala A, van Heerwaarden J, Giller KE (2016) Understanding variability in soybean yield and response to P-fertilizer and rhizobium inoculants on farmers’ fields in northern Nigeria. Field Crops Res 186:133–145 · DOI
- Roobroeck D, Palm CA, Nziguheba G, Weil R, Vanlauwe B (2021) Assessing and understanding non-responsiveness of maize and soybean to fertilizer applications in African smallholder farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ 305:107165 · DOI
- Sanchez PA (2010) Tripling crop yields in tropical Africa. Nat Geosci 3:299–300 · DOI
- Schut AGT, Gillet KE (2020) Sustainable intensification of Agriculture in Africa. Front Agr Sci Ang 7:371–375 · DOI
- Shehu BM, Merckx R, Jibrin JM, Kamara AY, Rurinda J (2018) Quantifying variability in maize yield response to nutrient applications in the northern Nigerian savanna. Agron 8:18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8020018 · DOI
- ten Berge HFM, Hijbeek R, van Loon MP, Rurinda J, Tesfaye K, Zingore S, van Ittersum MK (2019) Maize crop nutrient input requirements for food security in sub-Saharn Africa. Glob Food Secur 23:9–21 · DOI
- Tittonell P, Giller KE (2013) When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res 143:76–90 · DOI · Paper page
- Tittonell P, Vanlauwe B, de Ridder N, Giller KE (2007) Heterogeneity of crop productivity and resource use efficiency within smallholder Kenyan farms: soil fertility gradients or management intensity gradients? Agric Syst 94:376–390 · DOI
- UN Millennium project (2005) Halving hunger: it can be done. Earthscan, London
- van Heerwaarden J, Baijukya F, Kyei-Boahen S, Adjei-Nsiah S, Ebanyat P, Kamai N, Wolde-meskel E, Kanampiu F, Vanlauwe B, Giller KE (2018) Soyabean response to rhizobium inoculation across sub-Saharan Africa: patterns of variation and the role of promiscuity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 261:211–218 · DOI
- van Ittersum MK, van Bussel LGJ, Wolf J, Cassman KG (2016) Can sub-Saharan Africa feed itself? PNAS 113:1964–1469 · DOI
- Vanlauwe B, Bationo A, Chianu J, Giller KE, Merckx R, Mokwunye U, Ohiokpehai O, Pypers P, Tabo R, Shepherd KD, Smaling EMA, Woomer PL, Sanginga N (2010) Integrated soil fertility management: operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook Agr 39:17–24 · DOI
- Vanlauwe B, Kihara J, Chivenge P, Pypers P, Coe R, Six J (2011) Agronomic use efficiency of N fertilizer in maize-based systems in Sub-Saharan Africa within the context of integrated soil fertility management. Plant Soil 339:35–50 · DOI
- Vanlauwe B, Coyne D, Gockowski J, Hauser S, Huising J, Masso C, Nziguheba G, Schut M, Van Asten P (2014) Sustainable intensification and the smallholder farmer. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 8:15–22 · DOI
- Vanlauwe B, Coe R, Giller KE (2016) Beyond averages: new approaches to understand heterogeneity and risk of technology success or failure in smallholder farming. Exp Agr. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000193 · DOI
- Wortmann CS, Milner M, Kaizzi KC, Nouri M, Cyamweshi AR, Dicko MK, Kibunja CN, Macharia M, Maria R, Nalivata PC, Demissie N, Nkonde D, Ouattara K, Senkoro CJ, Tarfa BD, Tetteh FM (2017) Maize-nutrient response information applied across Sub-Saharan Africa. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 107:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9827-0 · DOI
- Xu X, He P, Pampolino MF, Johnston AM, Qiu S, Zhao S, Chuan L, Zhou W (2014) Fertilizer recommendation for maize in China based on yield response and agronomic efficiency. Field Crops Res 157:27–34 · DOI
- Zingore S, Murwira HK, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2007) Soil type, management history and current resource allocation: three dimensions regulating variability in crop productivity on African smallholder farms. Field Crops Res 101:296–305 · DOI
- Zingore S, Murwira HK, Delve RJ, Giller KE (2008) Variable grain legume yields, responses to Phosphorus and rotational effects on maize across soil fertility gradients on African smallholder farms. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 80:1–18 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Nziguheba, G., van Heerwaarden, J., & Vanlauwe, B.
- Affiliations
- International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (UG)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Nziguheba, Generose
- van Heerwaarden, Joost
- Venue
- Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
- Published
- 2021-10-21
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 257-269
- ISSN
- 1385-1314 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0867
- OpenAlex
- W3211104795
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Greater South Information System
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- Department for International Development
- International Fund for Agricultural Development
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Rice Cultivation and Yield Improvement
- Keywords
- sub-Saharan Africa, cereals, Fabaceae, fertilizer adoption, residual variance, production risk
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the prevalence of (non)-response to fertilizers in sub-Saharan Africa using on-farm trial data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10705-021-10174-1
- The paper
- Nziguheba, G., van Heerwaarden, J., & Vanlauwe, B. (2021). Quantifying the prevalence of (non)-response to fertilizers in sub-Saharan Africa using on-farm trial data. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-021-10174-1