The geographical polarization of the American electorate: a country of increasing electoral landslides?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many partisans in the USA appear to live in areas where they have little exposure to out-party members.
“In any case, many partisans in the USA appear to live in areas where they have little exposure to out-party members211,330.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [330]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Johnston, R., Manley, D., Jones, K., & Rohla, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Johnston, Ron
- Venue
- GeoJournal
- Published
- 2018-11-30
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 187-204
- ISSN
- 0343-2521 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9893
- OpenAlex
- W2902480383
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- GeoJournal (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
- Keywords
- American electorate, presidential elections, non-metropolitan areas, suburban districts, 2016 US presidential election, 2012 presidential election, 2008 presidential election, 1992 presidential election
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
