The value of mHealth for managing chronic conditions
Open accessAbstract
Chronic conditions place a high cost burden on the healthcare system and deplete the quality of life for millions of Americans. Digital innovations such as mobile health (mHealth) technology can be used to provide efficient and effective healthcare. In this research we explore the use of mobile technology to manage chronic conditions such as diabetes and hypertension. There is ample empirical evidence in the healthcare literature showing that patients who use mHealth observe improvement in their health. However, an analytical study that quantifies the benefit of using mHealth is lacking. The benefit of using mHealth depends on many factors such as the current health condition of the patient, pattern of disease progression, frequency of measurement and intervention, the effectiveness of intervention, and the cost of measuring. Stochastic modeling is a suitable approach to take these factors into consideration to evaluate the benefit of mHealth. In this paper, we model the disease progression with the help of a Markov chain and quantify the benefits of measuring and intervention taking into consideration the above-mentioned factors. We compare two different modes for measuring and intervention, mHealth mode and conventional office visit mode, and evaluate the impact of these factors on health outcome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital health interventions have become essential tools for improving health outcomes in chronic disease self-management.
“DHIs have become essential tools for improving health outcomes in chronic disease self-management (15).”
Cites
Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2002
American Diabetes Association (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.917 · Cited by 4,147 · see citing works
Mapping mHealth research: a decade of evolution
Fiordelli, M., Diviani, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2430 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
A content analysis of smartphone–based applications for hypertension management
Kumar, N., Khunger, M., Gupta, A., & Garg, N. (2015) · Journal of the American Society of Hypertension · doi:10.1016/j.jash.2014.12.001 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
DialBetics: A Novel Smartphone-based Self-management Support System for Type 2 Diabetes Patients
Waki, K., Fujita, H., Uchimura, Y., Omae, K., Aramaki, E., Kato, S., Lee, H., Kobayashi, H., Kadowaki, T., & Ohe, K. (2014) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296814526495 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Modeling Medical Treatment Using Markov Decision Processes
Schaefer, A. J., Bailey, M. D., Shechter, S. M., & Roberts, M. S. (2005) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/1-4020-8066-2_23 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Do people with existing chronic conditions benefit from telephone coaching? A rapid review
Dennis, S. M., Harris, M., Lloyd, J., Powell Davies, G., Faruqi, N., & Zwar, N. (2013) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah13005 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fernández, C. E., Maturana, C. A., Coloma, S. I., Carrasco-Labra, A., & Giacaman, R. A. (2021) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/00220345211003828 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Effect of mHealth in improving oral hygiene: A systematic review with meta‐analysis
Toniazzo, M. P., Nodari, D., Muniz, F. W. M. G., & Weidlich, P. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/jcpe.13083 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Xue, H., Zhang, L., Shi, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Tan, W., & Liu, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1630588 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Agnihothri, S., Cui, L., Delasay, M., & Rajan, B.
- Affiliations
- Binghamton University (US)
- Stony Brook University (US)
- California State University, East Bay (US)
- Corresponding author
- Agnihothri, Saligrama
- Venue
- Health Care Management Science
- Published
- 2018-10-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 185-202
- ISSN
- 1386-9620 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9389
- OpenAlex
- W2898817278
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Health Care Management Science (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
- Keywords
- mobile health, chronic disease management, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, Markov chain model, stochastic modeling, disease progression, intervention effectiveness, health outcomes, healthcare cost burden
- MeSH terms
- Chronic Disease, Humans, Markov Chains, Office Visits, Telemedicine, Disease Progression, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Disease Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review