Cited by 52Higher Education Research StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesEducational Outcomes and Influences

Facilitating academic performance in college: understanding the role of clear and organized instruction

Roksa, Josipa, Trolian, Teniell L., Blaich, Charles, Wise, Kathleen·2017·Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10734-016-0048-2

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roksa, J., Trolian, T. L., Blaich, C., & Wise, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
  • Wabash College (US)
Corresponding author
Roksa, Josipa
Venue
Higher Education
Published
2016-08-18
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
283-300
ISSN
  • 0018-1560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-174X
OpenAlex
W2515802015
Cited by
52
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
Spencer Foundation (#201300031)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
academic performance, first-year GPA, academic motivation, academic engagement, student development, college impact, academic preparation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review