The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The transformation of doctoral education: a systematic literature review
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition to this seemingly contradictory requisite, researchers are required to have not only good research skills but also good language skills, self-confidence, and presentation skills, as well as the ability to network internationally and to market themselves (Cardoso et al., 2022;Kouhia & Tammi, 2014).”
From Too stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students (2023) · cites this paper as Cardoso et al., 2022
Citations
Cites
Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines
Snyder, H. (2019) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 · Cited by 11,524
Selvi, A. F. (2019) · The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.4324/9780367824471-37 · Cited by 293
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Balaban, C. (2020). Diversifying the mission and expectations of doctoral education: Are we losing the distinctive ‘added value’ of the PhD? In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations (pp. 325–345). London, UK: Springer Nature. · DOI
- Bao, Y., Kehm, B., & Ma, Y (2018). From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 524–541. · DOI
- Bartelse, J., & Huisman, J. (2008). The Bologna process. In M. Nerad & M. Hegglund (Eds.), Toward a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 101–113). University of Washington Press.
- Bernstein, B., Evans, B., Fyffe, J., Halai, N., Hall, F., Jensen, H., Papeiva, K., & Ortega, S. (2014). The continuing evolution of the research doctorate. In M. Nerad & B. Evans (Eds.), Globalization and its impacts on the quality of PhD education: Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 5–30). Sense Publishers. · DOI
- Cardoso, S., Carvalho, T., & Videira, P. (2019). Is it still worth working in academia? The views from Portuguese academics. Higher Education Policy, 32(4), 663–679. · DOI
- Cardoso, S., Tavares, O., Sin, C., & Carvalho, T. (Eds.). (2020). Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations. London, UK: Springer Nature.
- Carvalho, T., & Cardoso, S. (2020). Conclusion: The transformation in doctoral education – A comprehensive and critical approach. In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations (pp. 375–389). London, UK: Springer Nature. · DOI
- Deem, R. (2020). Rethinking doctoral education: University purposes, academic cultures, mental health and the public good. In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations (pp. 13–42). London, UK: Springer Nature. · DOI · Paper page
- Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. SAGE.
- Kehm, B. (2020). Reforms of doctoral education in Europe and diversification of types. In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations (pp. 85–104). London, UK: Springer Nature. · DOI
- McAlpine, L. (2020). Views on the usefulness of the PhD outside academia: What do we know and need to know? In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations (pp. 241–274). London, UK: Springer Nature. · DOI
- Nerad, M. (2020). Governmental innovation policies, globalisation, and change in doctoral education worldwide: Are doctoral programmes converging? Trends and tensions. In S. Cardoso, O. Tavares, C. Sin, & T. Carvalho (Eds.), Structural and institutional transformations in doctoral education: Social, political and student expectations (pp. 43–84). London, UK: Springer Nature. · DOI
- Nerad, M. (2014). Introduction: Converging practices in PhD education. In M. Nerad & B. Evans (Eds.), Globalization and its impacts on the quality of PhD education: Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 1–4). Sense Publishers. · DOI
- Nerad, M., & Trzyna, T. (2008). Conclusion: Globalization and doctoral education – Toward a research agenda. In M. Nerad & M. Hegglund (Eds.), Toward a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 300–312). University of Washington Press.
- Nerad, M., & Heggelund, M. (Eds.). (2011). Toward a global PhD?: Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. University of Washington Press.
- Teichler, U. (2007). Higher education systems: Conceptual frameworks, comparative perspectives, empirical findings. Brill. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Too stupid for PhD? Doctoral impostor syndrome among Finnish PhD students
Nori, H., & Vanttaja, M. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00921-w · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardoso, S., Santos, S., Diogo, S., Soares, D., & Carvalho, T.
- Venue
- Higher Education
- Published
- 2022-01-07
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 885-908
- ISSN
- 0018-1560
- 1573-174X
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
