CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 125Wildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Why People Eat Bushmeat: Results From Two-Choice, Taste Tests in Gabon, Central Africa

Schenck, Michelle, Nsame Effa, Ernestine, Starkey, Malcolm, Wilkie, David, Abernethy, Kate, Telfer, Paul, Godoy, Ricardo, Treves, Adrian·2006·Human Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s10745-006-9025-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10745-006-9025-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Analysis of taste choices in Gabon indicated that consumers differentiate amongst bushmeat species and that wildlife cannot be treated as a generic food source.

    “Analysis of taste choices in Gabon indicated that consumers differentiate amongst bushmeat species and that wildlife cannot be treated as a generic food source (Knights 2008, Schenck et al. 2006).”

    From Empty forests, empty stomachs? Bushmeat and livelihoods in the Congo and Amazon Basins (2011) · cites this paper as Schenck et al. 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schenck, M., Nsame Effa, E., Starkey, M., Wilkie, D., Abernethy, K., Telfer, P., Godoy, R., & Treves, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (US)
  • Centre International de Recherches Médicales de Franceville (GA)
  • Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Wilkie, David
ORCID
Venue
Human Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2006-05-23
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
433-445
ISSN
  • 0300-7839 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9915
DOI
10.1007/s10745-006-9025-1
OpenAlex
W2139084029
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Human Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Keywords
bushmeat consumption, taste testing, food preferences, dietary protein, wildlife hunting, antelope, food security, sustainable hunting, Gabon, Congo Basin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review