The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving the American Eel Fishery Through the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge into Policy Level Decision Making in Canada
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“the full understanding of a Mi'kmaq knowledge system is not reflected in [current] management decisions”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Giles et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“Additionally, Mi'kmaq eel fisheries were found to be underpinned by the values of kinship, relationality, generosity and Netukulimk, whereas the governmental approach to eel fisheries was found to be governed by a Western scientific worldview that instead prioritizes process, compartmentalization, economic benefits and conservation.”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Giles et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“there are inherent challenges that arise from the attempted”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Giles et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“It follows that Mi'kmaq inclusion in the COSEWIC and SARA processes for eel should be a given, but Giles et al. (2016) find minimal evidence that Mi'kmaq were included in the process.”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Giles et al., 2016
In the citing paper
“The American eel case-study, with commercial interests, has been more challenging (Giles et al., 2016) and has focused on one small part of the eel's range.”
From “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management (2021) · cites this paper as Giles et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Barnhardt, R. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Alaska Native Ways of Knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 36(1): 8–23. · DOI
- Battiste, M. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge: Foundations for First Nations. World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium-WINHEC Journal.
- Battiste, M. (2011). Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. UBC Press.
- Berkes, F. (2006). From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons. Ecology and Society 11(1): 45–64. · DOI
- Berkes, F., and Henley, T. (1997). Co-Management and Traditional Knowledge: Threat or Opportunity? Policy Opinions Montreal 18(1): 29–30.
- Berkes, F., Armitage, D. R., and Doubleday, N. (2007). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC Press.
- Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1251–1262. · DOI
- Cargo, M., and Mercer, S. L. (2008). The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening its Practice. Annual Review of Public Health. (29) 325–350. · DOI
- Carm, E. (2014). Inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge System (IKS)—A Precondition for Sustainable Development and an Integral Part of Environmental Studies. The Journal of Educational Research 4(1): 58–76. · DOI
- Castleden, H., Garvin, T., and First Nation, H. (2008). Modifying Photo Voice for Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research. Social Science & Medicine 66(6): 1393–1405 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.030 . · DOI
- Chapin, F. I., Folke, C., and Kofinas, G. P. (2009). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship. Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. In A Framework for Understanding Change. Springer, New York, pp. 2–38.
- Cochran, P. A., Marshall, C. A., Garcia-Downing, C., Kendall, E., Cook, D., McCubbin, L., and Gover, R. M. (2008). Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Implications for Participatory Research and Community. American Journal of Public Health 98(1): 22–27 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641 . · DOI · Paper page
- Corntassel, J. (2012). Re-Envisioning Resurgence: Indigenous Pathways to Decolonization and Sustainable Self-Determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1(1): 86–101.
- Davis, A., Wagner, J., Prosper, K., and Paulette, M. J. (2004). The Paq’tnkek Mi’kmaq and ka’t (American eel): A Case Study of Cultural Relations, Meanings, and Prospects. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 24(2): 359–390.
- Denny, S., and Paul, T. (2012). Mi’kmaq Fisheries of Unama’ki. UNIR, Eskasoni Nova Scotia.
- Ens, E. J., Finlayson, M., Preuss, K., Jackson, S., and Holcombe, S. (2012). Australian Approaches for Managing ‘Country’Using Indigenous and Non‐Indigenous Knowledge. Ecological Management & Restoration 13(1): 100–107. · DOI
- Gratani, M., Butler, J. R., Royee, F., Valentine, P., Burrows, D., Canendo, W. I., and Anderson, A. S. (2011). Is validation of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge a Disrespectful Process? A Case Study of Traditional Fishing Poisons and Invasive Fish Management from the Wet Tropics. Australia. Ecology and Society 16(1): 1–14.
- Hassan, S. A., and Hanapi, M. S. (2013). “Scientificity” of Social Research: Its Challenges and Implications. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2(9): 62–73.
- Houde, N. (2007). The Six Faces of Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Challenges and Opportunities for Canadian Co-Management Arrangements. Ecology and Society 12(2): 34–45. · DOI
- Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs 54(2): 187–211. · DOI · Paper page
- Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. · DOI · Paper page
- Longino, H. E. (1990). Introduction: Good Science, Bad Science. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 3–15.
- Miller, M., and Casselman, J. (2014). The American eel: a fish of mystery and sustenance for humans. In Tsukamoto, K., and Kuroki, M. (eds.), Eels and Humans. Springer Press, pp. 155-169. · DOI
- Reo, N. J. (2011). The Importance of Belief Systems in Traditional Ecological Knowledge Initiatives. The International Indigenous Policy Journal 2(4): 8.
- Reo, N. J., and Whyte, K. P. (2012). Hunting and Morality as Elements of Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Human Ecology 40(1): 15–27 doi: 10.1007/s10745-011-9448-1 . · DOI
- Simpson, L. R. (2004). Anticolonial Strategies for the Recovery and Maintenance of Indigenous Knowledge. American Indian Quarterly 28(3): 373–384. · DOI
- Simpson, L. B. (2014). Land as Pedagogy: Nishnaabeg Intelligence and Rebellious Transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3(3): 1–25.
- Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a Case Study Methodology. The Qualitative Report 3(3): 1–17.
- Turnbull, D. (2009). Futures for Indigenous Knowledges. Futures 41(1): 1–5 doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.002 . · DOI
- Usher, P. J. (2000). Traditional Ecological Environmental Assessment and Management. Arctic 53(2): 183.
- Weiss, K., Hamann, M., and Marsh, H. (2013). Bridging Knowledges: Understanding and Applying Indigenous and Western Scientific Knowledge for Marine Wildlife Management. Society & Natural Resources 26(3): 285–302 doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.690065 . · DOI
- Whyte, K. P. (2013). On the Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as a Collaborative Concept: A Philosophical Study. Ecological Processes 2013: 7(2) doi: 10.1186/2192-1709-2-7 . · DOI
- Wicken, W. (2002). Mi'kmaq Treaties on Trial: History, Land, and Donald Marshall Junior. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. · DOI
- Wilson, S. (2008). Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing, Winnipeg.
Cited by
“Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management
Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652
“…provide a study unto itself, and so for the purposes of the present argument, we can instead take the existing groundwork that has been laid by Giles et al. (2016) who put forward a set of recommendations to improve Mi’kmaq input into the current Western-dominant approach to American eel…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Giles, A., Fanning, L., Denny, S., & Paul, T.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fanning, Lucia
- Venue
- Human Ecology
- Published
- 2016-02-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-183
- ISSN
- 0300-7839 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9915
- OpenAlex
- W2252929475
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Ecology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (895-2011-1007)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- Anguilla rostrata, indigenous knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge, fisheries management, policy decision-making, community management, sustainable use of marine resources, knowledge integration, worldview
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the American Eel Fishery Through the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge into Policy Level Decision Making in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10745-016-9814-0
- The paper
- Giles, A., Fanning, L., Denny, S., & Paul, T. (2016). Improving the American Eel Fishery Through the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge into Policy Level Decision Making in Canada. Human Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9814-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.