Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 35Indigenous Studies and EcologyMarine and fisheries researchIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improving the American Eel Fishery Through the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge into Policy Level Decision Making in Canada

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10745-016-9814-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Barnhardt, R. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Alaska Native Ways of Knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 36(1): 8–23. · DOI
  2. Battiste, M. (2005). Indigenous Knowledge: Foundations for First Nations. World Indigenous Nations Higher Education Consortium-WINHEC Journal.
  3. Battiste, M. (2011). Reclaiming Indigenous Voice and Vision. UBC Press.
  4. Berkes, F. (2006). From Community-Based Resource Management to Complex Systems: The Scale Issue and Marine Commons. Ecology and Society 11(1): 45–64. · DOI
  5. Berkes, F., and Henley, T. (1997). Co-Management and Traditional Knowledge: Threat or Opportunity? Policy Opinions Montreal 18(1): 29–30.
  6. Berkes, F., Armitage, D. R., and Doubleday, N. (2007). Adaptive co-management: Collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC Press.
  7. Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10(5): 1251–1262. · DOI
  8. Cargo, M., and Mercer, S. L. (2008). The Value and Challenges of Participatory Research: Strengthening its Practice. Annual Review of Public Health. (29) 325–350. · DOI
  9. Carm, E. (2014). Inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge System (IKS)—A Precondition for Sustainable Development and an Integral Part of Environmental Studies. The Journal of Educational Research 4(1): 58–76. · DOI
  10. Castleden, H., Garvin, T., and First Nation, H. (2008). Modifying Photo Voice for Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research. Social Science & Medicine 66(6): 1393–1405 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.030 . · DOI
  11. Chapin, F. I., Folke, C., and Kofinas, G. P. (2009). Principles of Ecosystem Stewardship. Resilience-Based Natural Resource Management in a Changing World. In A Framework for Understanding Change. Springer, New York, pp. 2–38.
  12. Cochran, P. A., Marshall, C. A., Garcia-Downing, C., Kendall, E., Cook, D., McCubbin, L., and Gover, R. M. (2008). Indigenous Ways of Knowing: Implications for Participatory Research and Community. American Journal of Public Health 98(1): 22–27 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.093641 . · DOI · Paper page
  13. Corntassel, J. (2012). Re-Envisioning Resurgence: Indigenous Pathways to Decolonization and Sustainable Self-Determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1(1): 86–101.
  14. Davis, A., Wagner, J., Prosper, K., and Paulette, M. J. (2004). The Paq’tnkek Mi’kmaq and ka’t (American eel): A Case Study of Cultural Relations, Meanings, and Prospects. The Canadian Journal of Native Studies 24(2): 359–390.
  15. Denny, S., and Paul, T. (2012). Mi’kmaq Fisheries of Unama’ki. UNIR, Eskasoni Nova Scotia.
  16. Ens, E. J., Finlayson, M., Preuss, K., Jackson, S., and Holcombe, S. (2012). Australian Approaches for Managing ‘Country’Using Indigenous and Non‐Indigenous Knowledge. Ecological Management & Restoration 13(1): 100–107. · DOI
  17. Gratani, M., Butler, J. R., Royee, F., Valentine, P., Burrows, D., Canendo, W. I., and Anderson, A. S. (2011). Is validation of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge a Disrespectful Process? A Case Study of Traditional Fishing Poisons and Invasive Fish Management from the Wet Tropics. Australia. Ecology and Society 16(1): 1–14.
  18. Hassan, S. A., and Hanapi, M. S. (2013). “Scientificity” of Social Research: Its Challenges and Implications. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2(9): 62–73.
  19. Houde, N. (2007). The Six Faces of Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Challenges and Opportunities for Canadian Co-Management Arrangements. Ecology and Society 12(2): 34–45. · DOI
  20. Hurlbert, S. H. (1984). Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments. Ecological Monographs 54(2): 187–211. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Longino, H. E. (1990). Introduction: Good Science, Bad Science. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 3–15.
  23. Miller, M., and Casselman, J. (2014). The American eel: a fish of mystery and sustenance for humans. In Tsukamoto, K., and Kuroki, M. (eds.), Eels and Humans. Springer Press, pp. 155-169. · DOI
  24. Reo, N. J. (2011). The Importance of Belief Systems in Traditional Ecological Knowledge Initiatives. The International Indigenous Policy Journal 2(4): 8.
  25. Reo, N. J., and Whyte, K. P. (2012). Hunting and Morality as Elements of Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Human Ecology 40(1): 15–27 doi: 10.1007/s10745-011-9448-1 . · DOI
  26. Simpson, L. R. (2004). Anticolonial Strategies for the Recovery and Maintenance of Indigenous Knowledge. American Indian Quarterly 28(3): 373–384. · DOI
  27. Simpson, L. B. (2014). Land as Pedagogy: Nishnaabeg Intelligence and Rebellious Transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 3(3): 1–25.
  28. Tellis, W. (1997). Application of a Case Study Methodology. The Qualitative Report 3(3): 1–17.
  29. Turnbull, D. (2009). Futures for Indigenous Knowledges. Futures 41(1): 1–5 doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2008.07.002 . · DOI
  30. Usher, P. J. (2000). Traditional Ecological Environmental Assessment and Management. Arctic 53(2): 183.
  31. Weiss, K., Hamann, M., and Marsh, H. (2013). Bridging Knowledges: Understanding and Applying Indigenous and Western Scientific Knowledge for Marine Wildlife Management. Society & Natural Resources 26(3): 285–302 doi: 10.1080/08941920.2012.690065 . · DOI
  32. Whyte, K. P. (2013). On the Role of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as a Collaborative Concept: A Philosophical Study. Ecological Processes 2013: 7(2) doi: 10.1186/2192-1709-2-7 . · DOI
  33. Wicken, W. (2002). Mi'kmaq Treaties on Trial: History, Land, and Donald Marshall Junior. University of Toronto Press, Toronto. · DOI
  34. Wilson, S. (2008). Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Fernwood Publishing, Winnipeg.

Cited by

  • “Two‐Eyed Seeing”: An Indigenous framework to transform fisheries research and management

    Reid, A. J., Eckert, L. E., Lane, J., Young, N., Hinch, S. G., Darimont, C. T., Cooke, S. J., Ban, N. C., & Marshall, A. (2021) · Fish and Fisheries · doi:10.1111/faf.12516 · Cited by 652

    “…provide a study unto itself, and so for the purposes of the present argument, we can instead take the existing groundwork that has been laid by Giles et al. (2016) who put forward a set of recommendations to improve Mi’kmaq input into the current Western-dominant approach to American eel…”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Giles, A., Fanning, L., Denny, S., & Paul, T.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Fanning, Lucia
Venue
Human Ecology
Published
2016-02-08
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
167-183
ISSN
  • 0300-7839 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9915
OpenAlex
W2252929475
Cited by
35
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Human Ecology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (895-2011-1007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
Anguilla rostrata, indigenous knowledge, traditional ecological knowledge, fisheries management, policy decision-making, community management, sustainable use of marine resources, knowledge integration, worldview

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving the American Eel Fishery Through the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge into Policy Level Decision Making in Canada. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10745-016-9814-0
The paper
Giles, A., Fanning, L., Denny, S., & Paul, T. (2016). Improving the American Eel Fishery Through the Incorporation of Indigenous Knowledge into Policy Level Decision Making in Canada. Human Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9814-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.