Cited by 60Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsFish Biology and Ecology StudiesReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

Patterns of genome size diversity in the ray-finned fishes

Smith, Emily M., Gregory, T. Ryan·2009·Hydrobiologia

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10750-009-9724-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, E. M., & Gregory, T. R.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Gregory, T. Ryan
Venue
Hydrobiologia
Published
2009-03-03
Volume
625
Issue
1
Pages
1-25
ISSN
  • 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5117
OpenAlex
W2010064120
Cited by
60
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Hydrobiologia (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
genome size, Actinopterygii, interspecific variation, polyploidy, haploid genome size, fish ecology, fish morphology, fish growth, fish physiology, fish reproduction, fish longevity, taxonomic diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review