Cited by 165Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecologyEnvironmental and Sediment ControlAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

A comparative review of recovery processes in rivers, lakes, estuarine and coastal waters

Open access
Verdonschot, P. F. M., Spears, B. M., Feld, C. K., Brucet, S., Keizer-Vlek, H., Borja, A., Elliott, M., Kernan, M. +1 more·2013·Hydrobiologia

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10750-012-1294-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The successful restoration rate of lakes from eutrophication and acidification was higher than most rivers.

    “Verdonschot et al. (2013) who qualitatively concluded that the successful restoration rate of lakes from eutrophication and acidification was higher than most rivers.”

    From A meta-analysis of environmental responses to freshwater ecosystem restoration in China (1987–2018) (2023) · cites this paper as Verdonschot et al., 2013

    The supplied passages labeled Abstract and “3 Finished” contain bibliographic details and keywords, not the review’s findings. Further searches for eutrophication, acidification, and comparative restoration success returned no passage addressing whether lakes had a higher successful restoration rate than most rivers. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verdonschot, P. F. M., Spears, B. M., Feld, C. K., Brucet, S., Keizer-Vlek, H., Borja, A., Elliott, M., Kernan, M., & Johnson, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
  • European Commission (BE)
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Verdonschot, P. F. M.
Venue
Hydrobiologia
Published
2012-09-18
Volume
704
Issue
1
Pages
453-474
ISSN
  • 0018-8158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-5117
OpenAlex
W2150628319
Cited by
165
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hydrobiologia (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • AZTI Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and Sediment Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
ecosystem recovery, restoration ecology, Water Framework Directive, river basins, lakes, estuaries, coastal waters, ecological status, land use change, water use change, restoration success, ecological knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review