CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 72

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Challenges of Designing and Implementing a Doctoral Student Mentoring Program

Holley, Karri A., Caldwell, Mary Lee·2012·Innovative Higher Education
DOI 10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Anderson, E., & Shannon, A. (1988). Toward a conceptualization of mentoring. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 38–42. · DOI
  2. Bair, C., & Haworth, J. G. (2004). Research on doctoral student attrition and retention: A meta synthesis. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research XIX (pp. 481–534). New York, NY: Agathon.
  3. Baird, L. (1995). Helping graduate students: A graduate advisor’s view. In A. Pruitt-Logan and P. Isaac (Eds.), Student services for the changing graduate student population (pp. 25–32). New Directions for Student Services, 72. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Becker, H. (1998). Tricks of the trade: How to think about your research while you’re doing it. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  5. Bell-Ellison, B., & Dedrick, R. F. (2008). What do graduate students value in their ideal mentor? Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 555–567. · DOI
  6. Brown, M., Davis, G., & McClendon, S. (1999). Mentoring graduate students of color: Myths, models, and modes. Peabody Journal of Education, 74(2), 105–118. · DOI
  7. Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  8. Davidson, M., & Foster-Johnson, L. (2001). Mentoring in the preparation of graduate researchers of color. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 549–574. · DOI
  9. Gardner, S. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?” The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326–350. · DOI
  10. Golde, C., & Dore, T. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of today’s doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts.
  11. Johnson-Bailey, J. (2004). Hitting and climbing the proverbial wall: Participation and retention issues for Black graduate women. Race, Ethnicity, & Education, 7(4), 331–349. · DOI
  12. Nerad, M., & Cerny, J. (1993). From facts to action: Expanding the graduate division’s educational role. In L. Baird (Ed.), Increasing Graduate Student Retention and Degree Attainment (pp. 27–39). New Directions for Institutional Research, 80. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Paglis, L., Green, S., & Bauer, T. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rose, G. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53–80. · DOI
  15. Weidman, P., Twale, D., & Stein, E. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC higher education report, 28. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Holley, K. A., & Caldwell, M. L.
Venue
Innovative Higher Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-11-12
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
243-253
ISSN
  • 0742-5627
  • 1573-1758
DOI
10.1007/s10755-011-9203-y
Cited by
72
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review