A research preparatory program for first-year college students: Student selection and preparation lead to persistence in research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women were more likely to credit the program for engaging them in research compared to men (p = 0.021).
“Women were more likely to credit the program for engaging them in research compared to men (p = 0.021).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Baiduc et al., 2017
Participants were significantly more involved in undergraduate research compared to non-participants.
“Participants were significantly more involved in undergraduate research compared to non-participants.”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Baiduc et al., 2017
Participants in the Baiduc et al. (2017) program engaged in research for an average of 2.3 quarters, compared to 1.0 quarters for non-participants (p < 0.001).
“Participants engaged in research for an average of 2.3 quarters, compared to 1.0 quarters for non-participants (p < 0.001).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Baiduc et al., 2017
Female students with male mentors participated in 3.9 quarters of research, whereas those with female mentors participated in only 1.8 quarters.
“Female students with male mentors participated in 3.9 quarters of research, whereas those with female mentors participated in only 1.8 quarters.”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Baiduc et al., 2017
Average post-survey research knowledge score was 4.4/6, up from 4.1/6 (p = 0.002).
“Average post-survey research knowledge score was 4.4/6, up from 4.1/6 (p = 0.002).”
From Pathway to Medicine and Health Programs Revisited: Outcomes and Institutional Adaptations in Greater Philadelphia and Beyond (2026) · cites this paper as Baiduc et al., 2017
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Hunter, A., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20173 · Cited by 1,324 · see citing works
Importance of undergraduate research for minority persistence and achievement in biology
Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E. L., & Villarejo, M. (2010) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0082 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Importance of Undergraduate Research for Minority Persistence and Achievement in Biology
Jones, M. T., Barlow, A. E. L., & Villarejo, M. (2010) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2010.11778971 · Cited by 349 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bright, D., Hughes, S., & Muir, R. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16010170 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baiduc, R. R., Drane, D., Beitel, G. J., & Flores, L. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Baiduc, Rachael R.
- Venue
- Innovative Higher Education
- Published
- 2016-09-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 269-284
- ISSN
- 0742-5627 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1758
- OpenAlex
- W2511159229
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 5.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Innovative Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Michigan
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- undergraduate research, first-year students, STEM persistence, student selection, research mentorship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
