CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 62

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Breaking Through Disciplinary Barriers: Human–Wildlife Interactions and Multispecies Ethnography

Parathian, Hannah E., McLennan, Matthew R., Hill, Catherine M., Frazão-Moreira, Amélia, Hockings, Kimberley J.·2018·International Journal of Primatology
DOI 10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9PMC PMC6267646
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Drawing upon adjacent developments in the conservation social sciences will likely enable the identification of new objectives and parameters for models to fit better with the realities of conservation practice.

    “Doing so will likely enable the identification of new objectives and parameters for models to fit better with the realities of conservation practice58–63.”

    From Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [59]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 158

  1. Aerts, S., Bovenkerk, B., & Brando, S. (2016). A philosophical and technical critique of zooanthropology as a moral and practical paradigm. In A. S. Olsson, S. M. Araújo, & M. Fátima Vieira (Eds.), Food futures: Ethics, science and culture (pp. 65–81). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
  2. Agrawal, A., & Redford, K. (2006). Poverty, development, and biodiversity conservation: Shooting in the dark? Wildlife Conservation Society Working Paper Series, 26. Bronx: Wildlife Conservation Society.
  3. Aisher, A. (2007). Voices of uncertainty: Spirits, humans and forests in upland Arunachal Pradesh, India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 30(3), 479–498. · DOI
  4. Aisher, A., & Damodaran, V. (2016). Introduction: Human–nature interactions through a multispecies lens. Conservation and Society, 14, 293–304. · DOI
  5. Angelici, F. M. (Ed.) (2016). Problematic wildlife: A cross-disciplinary approach. Cham: Springer.
  6. Asquith, P. J. (1986). Anthropomorphism and the Japanese and Western traditions in primatology. In J. G. Else & P. C. Lee (Eds.), Primate ontogeny, cognition, and social behavior (pp. 61–71). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Atran, S. (1999). Itzaj Maya folkbiological taxonomy: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. In D. L. Medin & S. Atran (Eds.), Folkbiology (pp. 119–213). Cambridge: MIT Press. · DOI
  8. Baker, L. R., Olubode, O. S., Tanimola, A. A., & Garshelis, D. L. (2014). Role of local culture, religion, and human attitudes in the conservation of sacred populations of a threatened ‘pest’ species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 23, 1895–1909. · DOI
  9. Barker, C. (2005). Cultural studies: Theory and practice. London: SAGE.
  10. Barker, G., & Odling-Smee, J. (2014). Integrating ecology and evolution: Niche construction and ecological engineering. In G. Barker, G. E. Desjardins, & T. Pearce (Eds.), Entangled life: Organism and environment in the biological and social sciences (pp. 187–211). Dordrecht: Springer. · DOI
  11. Baynes-Rock, M. (2013). Life and death in the multispecies commons. Social Science Information, 52(2), 210–227. · DOI
  12. Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K. M. A., Christie, P., et al (2017a). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108. · DOI
  13. Bennett, N. J., Roth, R., Klain, S. C., Chan, K. M. A., Clark, D. A., Cullman, G., Epstein, G., Nelson, M. P., Stedman, R., Teel, T. L., Thomas, R. E. W., Wyborn, C., Curran, D., Greenberg, A., Sandlos, J., & Veríssimo, D. (2017b). Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conservation Biology, 31, 56–66. · DOI
  14. Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18, 621–630. · DOI
  15. Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10, 1251–1262. · DOI
  16. Bessa, J., Sousa, C., & Hockings, K. J. (2015). Feeding ecology of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) inhabiting a forest-mangrove-savanna-agricultural matrix at Caiquene-Cadique, Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. American Journal of Primatology, 77(6), 651–665. · DOI
  17. Bulmer, R. (1967). Why is the cassowary not a bird? A problem of zoological taxonomy among the Karam of the New Guinea Highlands. Man, 2, 5–25. · DOI
  18. Caro, T., & Eadie, J. (2005). Animal behavior and conservation biology. In J. J. Bolhuis & L. A. Giraldeau (Eds.), The behavior of animals: Mechanisms, function and evolution (pp. 367–392). Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  19. Castree, N., Adams, W. M., Barry, J., Brockington, D., Büscher, B., Corbera, E., Demeritt, D., Duffy, R., Felt, U., Neves, K., Newell, P., Pellizzoni, L., Rigby, K., Robbins, P., Robin, L., Rose, D. B., Ross, A., Schlosberg, D., Sörlin, S., West, P., Whitehead, M., & Wynne, B. (2014). Changing the intellectual climate. Nature Climate Change, 4, 763–768. · DOI
  20. Catarino, L., Martins, E. S., Basto, M. F., & Diniz, M. A. (2008). An annotated checklist of the vascular flora of Guinea-Bissau (West Africa). Blumea: Biodiversity, evolution and biogeography of plants, 53, 1–222. Chicago: Naturalis Biodiversity Center.
  21. Conklin, H. C. (1954). The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.
  22. Corlett, R. T. (2015). The Anthropocene concept in ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 36–41. · DOI
  23. Cormier, L. A. (2010). Kinship with monkeys: The Guajá foragers of eastern Amazonia. New York: Columbia University Press.
  24. Costa, S., Casanova, C., & Lee, P. (2017). What does conservation mean for women? The case of the Cantanhez Forest National Park. Conservation and Society, 15, 168–178. · DOI
  25. Daily, G. C., & Ehrlich, P. R. (1999). Managing Earth’s ecosystems: An interdisciplinary challenge. Ecosystems, 2, 277–280. · DOI
  26. Day, R. L., Laland, K. N., & Odling-Smee, F. J. (2003). Rethinking adaptation: The niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(1), 80–95. · DOI
  27. De Waal, F. (2001). The ape and the sushi master: Cultural reflections of a primatologist. New York: Basic Books.
  28. Decker, D. J., Brown, T. L., & Mattfeld, G. F. (1987). Integrating social science into wildlife management: Barriers and limitations. In M. I. Miller, R. P. Gale, & P. J. Brown (Eds.), Social science in natural resource management systems (pp. 83–92). Boulder: Westview Press.
  29. Descola, P. (1994). In the society of nature: A native ecology in Amazonia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Descola, P. (2014). Modes of being and forms of predication. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 4, 271–280. · DOI
  31. Despret, V. (2013). Responding bodies and partial affinities in human–animal worlds. Theory, Culture & Society, 30, 51–76. · DOI
  32. Dore, K. M., Riley, E. P., & Fuentes, A. (Eds.) (2017). Ethnoprimatology: A practical guide to research at the human–primate interface. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Ellen, R. F. (2006). Ethnobiology and the science of humankind. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  34. Erickson, F. (2011). A history of qualitative inquiry in social and educational research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research 4 (pp. 43–59). California: SAGE.
  35. Etiendem, D. N., Hens, L., & Pereboom, Z. (2011). Traditional knowledge systems and the conservation of Cross River gorillas: A case study of Bechati, Fossimondi, Besali, Cameroon. Ecology and Society, 16, 22. · DOI
  36. Fox, H. E., Christian, C., Nordby, J. C., Pergams, O. R., Peterson, G. D., et al (2006). Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology, 20, 1817–1820. · DOI
  37. Frank, B. (2016). Human–wildlife conflicts and the need to include tolerance and coexistence: An introductory comment. Society & Natural Resources, 29, 738–743. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Frazão-Moreira, A. (2009). Plantas e “Pecadores.” Percepções da Natureza em África. Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.
  39. Frazão-Moreira, A. (2010). A natureza em perspectiva: Reflexões sobre saberes ecológicos locais e conhecimentos científicos. In A. Alves, F. Souto, & N. Peroni (Eds.), Etnoecologia em perspectiva: Natureza, cultura e conservação (pp. 73–88). Recife: NUPEEA.
  40. Frazão-Moreira, A. F. (2016a). Challenging approaches and crossovers in anthropology and conservation in Guinea-Bissau. Etnografica, 20, 663–667. · DOI
  41. Frazão-Moreira, A. F. (2016b). The symbolic efficacy of medicinal plants: Practices, knowledge, and religious beliefs amongst the Nalu healers of Guinea-Bissau. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 12, 24. · DOI
  42. Fuentes, A. (2006). Human–nonhuman primate interconnections and their relevance to anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 1–11. · DOI
  43. Fuentes, A. (2010a). Naturalcultural encounters in Bali: Monkeys, temples, tourists, and ethnoprimatology. Cultural Anthropology, 25, 600–624. · DOI
  44. Fuentes, A. (2010b). The new biological anthropology: Bringing Washburn’s new physical anthropology into 2010 and beyond: The 2008 AAPA luncheon lecture. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143(S51), 2–12. · DOI
  45. Fuentes, A. (2012). Ethnoprimatology and the anthropology of the human–primate interface. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 101–117. · DOI
  46. Fuentes, A., & Hockings, K. J. (2010). The ethnoprimatological approach in primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 841–847. · DOI
  47. Fuentes, A., & Wolfe, L. D. (Eds.) (2002). Primates face to face: The conservation implications of human–nonhuman primate interconnections. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  48. Fuentes, A., Southern, M., & Suaryana, K. G. (2005). Monkey forests and human landscapes: Is extensive sympatry sustainable for Homo sapiens and Macaca fascicularis on Bali? In J. D. Paterson & J. Wallis (Eds.), Commensalism and conflict: The human–primate interface (pp. 168–195). Norman: American Society of Primatologists.
  49. Fuentes, A., Cortez, A. D., & Peterson, J. V. (2016). Ethnoprimatology and conservation: Applying insights and developing practice. In M. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology: Primate conservation in the 21st century (pp. 1–19). Cham: Springer.
  50. Fuentes, A., Riley, E. P., & Dore, K. M. (2017). Ethnoprimatology matters: Integration, innovation, and intellectual generosity. In K. M. Dore, E. P. Riley, & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethnoprimatology: A practical guide to research at the human–primate interface (pp. 297–302). New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  51. Giles-Vernick, T., & Rupp, S. K. (2006). Visions of apes, reflections on change: Telling tales of great apes in equatorial Africa. African Studies Review, 49, 51–73. · DOI
  52. Gillespie, K., & Collard, R. C. (Eds.) (2015). Critical animal geographies: Politics, intersections and hierarchies in a multispecies world. London and New York: Routledge.
  53. Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. London and New York: Routledge.
  54. Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  55. Haraway, D. J. (2010). When species meet: Staying with the trouble. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 53–55. · DOI
  56. Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press. · DOI
  57. Hardin, R., & Remis, M. J. (2006). Biological and cultural anthropology of a changing tropical forest: A fruitful collaboration across subfields. American Anthropologist, 108, 273–285. · DOI
  58. Hill, C. M. (2005). People, crops and primates: A conflict of interests. In J. D. Paterson & J. Wallis (Eds.), Commensalism and conflict: The human–primate interface (pp. 40–59). Norman: American Society of Primatologists.
  59. Hill, C. M. (2015). Perspectives of ‘conflict’ at the wildlife-agriculture boundary: 10 years on. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20(4), 296–301. · DOI
  60. Hill, C. M. (2017). Primate crop feeding behavior, crop protection, and conservation. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 385–400. · DOI
  61. Hill, C. M., & Wallace, G. E. (2012). Crop protection and conflict mitigation: Reducing the costs of living alongside non-human primates. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 2569–2587. · DOI
  62. Hill, C. M., & Webber, A. D. (2010). Perceptions of nonhuman primates in human–wildlife conflict scenarios. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 919–924. · DOI
  63. Hill, C. M., Webber, A. D., & Priston, N. E. (Eds.) (2017). Understanding conflicts about wildlife: A biosocial approach. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  64. Hockings, K. J. (2016). Mitigating human–nonhuman primate conflict. In A. Fuentes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology, 1–2 (pp. 1–8). Chichester: Wiley.
  65. Hockings, K. J., & McLennan, M. R. (2016). Problematic primate behaviour in agricultural landscapes: Chimpanzees as ‘pests’ and ‘predators’. In M. Waller (Ed.), Ethnoprimatology: Primate conservation in the 21st century (pp. 137–156). Cham: Springer. · DOI
  66. Hockings, K. J., & Sousa, C. (2012). Differential exploitation of cashew – a low conflict crop – by sympatric humans and chimpanzees. Oryx, 46, 375–381. · DOI
  67. Hockings, K. J., & Sousa, C. (2013). Human–chimpanzee sympatry and interactions in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau: Current research and future directions. Primate Conservation, 26, 57–65. · DOI
  68. Hockings, K. J., Yamakoshi, G., Kabasawa, A., & Matsuzawa, T. (2010). Attacks on local persons by chimpanzees in Bossou, Republic of Guinea: Long-term perspectives. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 887–896. · DOI
  69. Hockings, K. J., McLennan, M. R., Carvalho, S., Ancrenaz, M., Bobe, R., Byrne, R. W., Dunbar, R. I. M., Matsuzawa, T., McGrew, W. C., Williamson, E. A., Wilson, M. L., Wood, B., Wrangham, R. W., & Hill, C. M. (2015). Apes in the Anthropocene: Flexibility and survival. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 215–222. · DOI
  70. Hockings, K. J., Yamakoshi, G., & Matsuzawa, T. (2017). Dispersal of a human-cultivated crop by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in a forest–farm matrix. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 172–193. · DOI
  71. Humle, T., & Hill, C. (2016). People–primate interactions: Implications for primate conservation. In S. A. Wich & A. J. Marshall (Eds.), An introduction to primate conservation (pp. 219–240). Don Mills: Oxford University Press. · DOI
  72. Hunn, E. S. (1977). Tzeltal folk-zoology: The classification of discontinuities in nature. San Diego: Elsevier.
  73. Hurn, S. (2017). Human–animal relations (HAR). In A. Fuentes (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology, 2, 511. Chichester: Wiley.
  74. Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London and New York: Routledge.
  75. Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. London and New York: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
  76. Inskip, C., & Zimmerman, A. (2009). Human–felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx, 43, 18–34. · DOI
  77. Jalais, A. (2008). Unmasking the cosmopolitan tiger. Nature and Culture, 3, 25–40. · DOI
  78. Jones, J. P., Andriamarovololona, M. M., & Hockley, N. (2008). The importance of taboos and social norms to conservation in Madagascar. Conservation Biology, 22, 976–986. · DOI
  79. Jost Robinson, C. A. J., & Remis, M. J. (2014). Entangled realms: Hunters and hunted in the Dzanga-Sangha Dense Forest Reserve (APDS), Central African Republic. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(3), 613–633. · DOI
  80. Keil, P. G. (2016). Colonising in the footsteps of elephants: Interspecies pathways through North-East India and beyond. Paper presented at SOAS Elephant Conference, Centre for Ecological Sciences [CES], Indian Institute of Science [IISc], Bangalore, 4–6 April 2016.
  81. Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25, 545–576. · DOI
  82. Köhler, A. (2005). Of apes and men: Baka and Bantu attitudes to wildlife and the making of eco-goodies and baddies. Conservation and Society, 3, 407–435.
  83. Kohn, E. (2007). How dogs dream: Amazonian natures and the politics of transspecies engagement. American Ethnologist, 34, 3–24. · DOI
  84. Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Oakland: University of California Press. · DOI
  85. Leblan, V. (2013). Introduction: Emerging approaches in the anthropology/primatology borderland. Revue de Primatologie, (5), 62. · DOI
  86. Leblan, V., & Bricka, B. (2013). Genies or the opacity of human–animal relationships in Kakande, Guinea. African Study Monographs, 34, 85–108.
  87. Lee, P. C. (2010). Sharing space: Can ethnoprimatology contribute to the survival of nonhuman primates in human-dominated globalized landscapes? American Journal of Primatology, 72, 925–931. · DOI
  88. Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. · DOI
  89. Lestel, D., & Taylor, H. (2013). Shared life: An introduction. Social Science Information, 52, 183–186. · DOI
  90. Lestel, D., Brunois, F., & Gaunet, F. (2006). Etho-ethnology and ethno-ethology. Social Science Information, 45, 155–177. · DOI
  91. Lingomo, B., & Kimura, D. (2009). Taboo of eating bonobo among the Bongando people in the Wamba region, Democratic Republic of Congo. African Study Monographs, 30, 209–225.
  92. Locke, P. (2013). Explorations in ethnoelephantology: Social, historical, and ecological intersections between Asian elephants and humans. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, 4(1), 79–97. · DOI
  93. Locke, P. (2017). Elephants as persons, affective apprenticeship, and fieldwork with nonhuman informants in Nepal. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 7, 353–376. · DOI
  94. Locke, P., & Münster, U. (2015). Multispecies anthropology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  95. Malone, N., Wade, A. S., Fuentes, A., Riley, E. P., Remis, M., et al (2014). Ethnoprimatology: Critical interdisciplinarity and multispecies approaches in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 34, 8–29. · DOI
  96. Marchesini, R. (2016). Zoomimesis: Animal inspiration. Angelaki, 21, 175–197. · DOI
  97. Mascia, M. B., Brosius, J. P., Dobson, T. A., Forbes, B. C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. A., & Turner, N. J. (2003). Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology, 17, 649–650. · DOI
  98. McKinney, T. (2015). A classification system for describing anthropogenic influence on nonhuman primate populations. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 715–726. · DOI
  99. McLennan, M. R. (2008). Beleaguered chimpanzees in the agricultural district of Hoima, western Uganda. Primate Conservation, 23, 45–54. · DOI
  100. McLennan, M. R., & Hill, C. M. (2012). Troublesome neighbours: Changing attitudes towards chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a human-dominated landscape in Uganda. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20, 219–227. · DOI
  101. McLennan, M. R., & Hill, C. M. (2013). Ethical issues in the study and conservation of an African great ape in an unprotected, human-dominated landscape in western Uganda. In J. MacClancy & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethics in the field: Contemporary challenges (pp. 42–66). Oxford: Berghahn Books.
  102. McLennan, M. R., & Hockings, K. J. (2016). The aggressive apes? Causes and contexts of great ape attacks on local persons. In F. M. Angelici (Ed.), Problematic wildlife: A cross-disciplinary approach (pp. 373–394). Cham: Springer. · DOI
  103. McLennan, M. R., Spagnoletti, N., & Hockings, K. J. (2017). The implications of primate behavioral flexibility for sustainable human–primate coexistence in anthropogenic habitats. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 105–121. · DOI
  104. Messmer, T. A. (2009). Human–wildlife conflicts: Emerging challenges and opportunities. Human–Wildlife Conflicts, 3, 10–17.
  105. Moon, K., & Blackman, D. (2014). A guide to understanding social science research for natural scientists. Conservation Biology, 28, 1167–1177. · DOI
  106. Morris, W. (Ed.) (1969). American heritage dictionary of the English language. Rockville: American Heritage.
  107. Newing, H. (2010). Conducting research in conservation: A social science perspective. London: Routledge. · DOI
  108. Odling-Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N., & Feldman, M. W. (2003). Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  109. Odling-Smee, F. J., Erwin, D. H., Palkovacs, E. P., Feldman, M. W., & Laland, K. N. (2013). Niche construction theory: A practical guide for ecologists. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 88, 3–28. · DOI
  110. Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society, 4, 5–24. · DOI
  111. Oishi, T. (2013). Human-gorilla and gorilla-human: Dynamics of human–animal boundaries and interethnic relationships in the central African rainforest. Revue de Primatologie, (5), 63. · DOI
  112. Palmer, A., & Malone, N. (2018). Extending ethnoprimatology: Human–alloprimate relationships in managed settings. International Journal of Primatology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-017-0006-6 . · DOI
  113. Palsson, G., Szerszynski, B., Sörlin, S., Marks, J., Avril, B., Crumley, C., Hackmann, H., Holm, P., Ingram, J., Kirman, A., Buendía, M. P., & Weehuizen, R. (2013). Reconceptualizing the ‘Anthropos’ in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environmental Science & Policy, 28, 3–13. · DOI
  114. Papworth, S., Milner-Gulland, E. J., & Slocombe, K. (2013). The natural place to begin: The ethnoprimatology of the Waorani. American Journal of Primatology, 75, 1117–1128. · DOI
  115. Parathian, H. E., & Maldonado, A. M. (2010). Human–nonhuman primate interactions amongst Tikuna people: Perceptions and local initiatives for resource management in Amacayacu in the Colombian Amazon. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 855–865. · DOI
  116. Pasquini, L., Fitzsimons, J., Cowell, S., Brandon, K., & Wescott, G. (2011). The establishment of large private nature reserves by conservation NGOs: Key factors for successful implementation. Oryx, 45, 373–380. · DOI
  117. Paterson, J. D., & Wallis, J. (Eds.) (2005). Commensalism and conflict: The human–primate interface. Norman: American Society of Primatologists.
  118. Pearson, R. G. (2016). Reasons to conserve nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(5), 366–371. · DOI
  119. Redford, K. (2011). Misreading the conservation landscape. Oryx, 45, 324–330. · DOI
  120. Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., Adams, W. M., Sutherland, W. J., Whitehouse, A., Amar, A., Lambert, R. A., Linnell, J. D. C., Watt, A., & Gutiérrez, R. J. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 100–109. · DOI
  121. Remis, M. J., & Hardin, R. (2009). Transvalued species in an African forest. Conservation Biology, 23(6), 1588–1596. · DOI
  122. Remis, M. J., & Jost Robinson, C. A. (2017). Nonhuman primates and “others” in the Dzanga Sangha reserve: The role of anthropology and multispecies approaches in ethnoprimatology. In K. M. Dore, E. P. Riley, & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethnoprimatology: A practical guide to research at the human–primate interface (pp. 190–203). New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  123. Richards, P. (1995). Local understanding of primates and evolution: Some Mende beliefs concerning chimpanzees. In R. Corbey & B. Theunissen (Eds.), Ape, man, apeman: Changing views since 1600 (pp. 262–273). The Netherlands: Leiden University.
  124. Riley, E. P. (2006). Ethnoprimatology: Toward reconciliation between biological and cultural anthropology. Ecological and Environmental Anthropology, 2, 75–86.
  125. Riley, E. P. (2007). The human–macaque interface: Conservation implications of current and future overlap and conflict in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Anthropologist, 109, 473–484. · DOI
  126. Riley, E. P. (2008). Ranging patterns and habitat use of Sulawesi Tonkean macaques (Macaca tonkeana) in a human-modified habitat. American Journal of Primatology, 70, 670–679. · DOI
  127. Riley, E. P. (2010). The importance of human–macaque folklore for conservation in Lore Lindu National Park, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Oryx, 44, 235–240. · DOI
  128. Riley, E. P. (2013). Contemporary primatology in anthropology: Beyond the epistemological abyss. American Anthropologist, 115, 411–422. · DOI
  129. Riley, E. P., & Fuentes, A. (2011). Conserving social–ecological systems in Indonesia: Human–nonhuman primate interconnections in Bali and Sulawesi. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 62–74. · DOI
  130. Riley, E. P., & Priston, N. E. C. (2010). Macaques in farms and folklore: Exploring the human–nonhuman primate interface in Sulawesi, Indonesia. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 848–854. · DOI
  131. Rönnbäck, P., Troell, M., Zetterström, T., & Babu, D. (2003). Mangrove dependence and socio-economic concerns in shrimp hatcheries of Andhra Pradesh, India. Environmental Conservation, 30, 344–352. · DOI
  132. Rose, D. B., van Dooren, T., Chrulew, M., Cooke, S., Kearnes, M., et al (2012). Thinking through the environment, unsettling the humanities. Environmental Humanities, 1, 1–5. · DOI
  133. Rust, N. A., Tzanopoulos, J., Humle, T., & MacMillan, D. C. (2016). Why has human–carnivore conflict not been resolved in Namibia? Society & Natural Resources, 29, 1079–1094. · DOI
  134. Rust, N. A., Abrams, A., Challender, D. W., Chapron, G., Ghoddousi, A., et al (2017). Quantity does not always mean quality: The importance of qualitative social science in conservation research. Society & Natural Resources, 30, 1304–1310. · DOI
  135. Sandker, M., Campbell, B. M., Nzooh, Z., Sunderland, T., Amougou, V., Defo, L., & Sayer, J. (2009). Exploring the effectiveness of integrated conservation and development interventions in a central African forest landscape. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18, 2875–2892. · DOI
  136. Seoraj-Pillai, N., & Pillay, N. (2017). A meta-analysis of human–wildlife conflict: South African and global perspectives. Sustainability, 9, 34. · DOI
  137. Setchell, J. M., Fairet, E., Shutt, K., Waters, S., & Bell, S. (2017). Biosocial conservation: Integrating biological and ethnographic methods to study human–primate interactions. International Journal of Primatology, 38, 401–426. · DOI
  138. Sih, A., Ferrari, M. C., & Harris, D. J. (2011). Evolution and behavioural responses to human-induced rapid environmental change. Evolutionary Applications, 4, 367–387. · DOI
  139. Simberloff, D. (1988). The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 19, 473–511. · DOI
  140. Sousa, C., & Frazão-Moreira, A. (2010). Etnoprimatologia ao serviço da conservação na Guiné-Bissau: o chimpanzé como exemplo. In A. Alves, F. Souto, & N. Peroni (Eds.), Etnoecologia em Perspectiva: Natureza, Cultura e Conservação (pp. 187–200). Recife: NUPEEA.
  141. Sousa, J., Vicente, L., Gippoliti, S., Casanova, C., & Sousa, C. (2014). Local knowledge and perceptions of chimpanzees in Cantanhez National Park, Guinea-Bissau. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 122–134. · DOI
  142. Sousa, J., Hill, C. M., & Ainslie, A. (2017). Chimpanzees, sorcery and contestation in a protected area in Guinea-Bissau. Social Anthropology, 25, 364–379. · DOI
  143. Sousa, J., Ainslie, A., & Hill, C. M. (2018). Sorcery and nature conservation. Environmental Conservation, 45, 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000327 . · DOI
  144. Sponsel, L. E. (1997). The human niche in Amazonia: Explorations in ethnoprimatology. In W. G. Kinzey (Ed.), New world primates: Ecology, evolution, and behavior (pp. 143–165). New York: Aldine Gruyter.
  145. Strum, S. C. (1987). Almost human: A journey into the world of baboons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  146. Sutherland, W. J. (1998). The importance of behavioural studies in conservation biology. Animal Behaviour, 56, 801–809. · DOI
  147. Teel, T. L., Anderson, C. B., Burgman, M. A., Cinner, J., Clark, D., Estévez, R. A., Jones, J. P. G., McClanahan, T. R., Reed, M. S., Sandbrook, C., & St. John, F. A. V. (2018). Publishing social science research in Conservation Biology to move beyond biology. Conservation Biology, 32, 6–8. · DOI
  148. Temudo, M. P. (2009). From the margins of the state to the presidential palace: The Balanta case in Guinea-Bissau. African Studies Review, 52, 47–67. · DOI
  149. Temudo, M. (2012). “The white men bought the forests”: Conservation and contestation in Guinea-Bissau, western Africa. Conservation and Society, 10, 354–366. · DOI
  150. Thompson, J. M., Nestor, L. M., & Kabanda, R. B. (2008). Traditional land-use practices for bonobo conservation. In T. Furuichi & J. Thompson (Eds.), The bonobos: Behavior, ecology, and conservation (pp. 227–244). New York: Springer Science+Business Media. · DOI
  151. Treves, A., & Karanth, K. U. (2003). Human–carnivore conflict and perspectives on carnivore management worldwide. Conservation Biology, 17, 1491–1499. · DOI
  152. Tutin, C. E. G., & Oslisly, R. (1995). Homo, Pan and Gorilla: Co-existence over 60,000 years at Lopé in Central Gabon. Journal of Human Evolution, 28, 597–602. · DOI
  153. Wheatley, B. P. (1999). Sacred monkeys of Bali. Long Grove: Waveland Press.
  154. Wilkie, R. (2015). Multispecies scholarship and encounters: Changing assumptions at the human–animal nexus. Sociology, 49, 323–339. · DOI
  155. Wolverton, S., Nolan, J. M., & Ahmed, W. (2014). Ethnobiology, political ecology, and conservation. Journal of Ethnobiology, 34, 125–152. · DOI
  156. Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S., & Rabinowitz, A. (Eds.) (2005). People and wildlife: Conflict or co-existence? New York: Cambridge University Press.
  157. Yamakoshi, G., & Leblan, V. (2013). Conflicts between indigenous and scientific concepts of landscape management for wildlife conservation: Human–chimpanzee politics of coexistence at Bossou, Guinea. Revue de Primatologie, 5, 64.
  158. York, R., & Mancus, P. (2013). The invisible animal. Sociological Theory, 31, 75–91. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parathian, H. E., McLennan, M. R., Hill, C. M., Frazão-Moreira, A., & Hockings, K. J.
ORCID
Hockings, Kimberley J.
Venue
International Journal of Primatology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-04-18
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
749-775
ISSN
  • 0164-0291
  • 1573-8604
DOI
10.1007/s10764-018-0027-9
PMC
PMC6267646
Cited by
62
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (tdm)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (IF/01128/2014)
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Centre for Research in Anthropology (None)
  • ARCUS

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review