The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Being Alive
Abstract
Anthropology is a disciplined inquiry into the conditions and potentials of human life. Generations of theorists, however, have expunged life from their accounts, treating it as the mere output of patterns, codes, structures or systems variously defined as genetic or cultural, natural or social. Building on his classic work The Perception of the Environment, Tim Ingold sets out to restore life to where it should belong, at the heart of anthropological concern. Being Alive ranges over such themes as the vitality of materials, what it means to make things, the perception and formation of the ground, the mingling of earth and sky in the weather-world, the experiences of light, sound and feeling, the role of storytelling in the integration of knowledge, and the potential of drawing to unite observation and description. Our humanity, Ingold argues, does not come ready-made but is continually fashioned in our movements along ways of life. Starting from the idea of life as a process of wayfaring, Ingold presents a radically new understanding of movement, knowledge and description as dimensions not just of being in the world, but of being alive to what is going on there.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The optimal path assumption is very restrictive when investigating past movement.
“This is an assumption that is very restrictive when investigating past movement (see e.g.Ingold 2011), and many studies in archaeological path modelling over the past decade have tried to come to grip with this.”
From Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Ingold 2011
The practice of wayfaring implies a completely different movement strategy than transporting trade goods or moving in a ritual procession.
“For example, the practice of wayfaring (Ingold 2011) implies a completely different movement strategy than when transporting trade goods or when moving in a ritual procession.”
From Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches (2019) · cites this paper as Ingold 2011
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Everyday dwelling with WhatsApp
O'Hara, K. P., Massimi, M., Harper, R., Rubens, S., & Morris, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing · doi:10.1145/2531602.2531679 · Cited by 304
The Anthropology of Ethics and Morality
Mattingly, C., & Throop, J. (2018) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050129 · Cited by 234
Modelling of pathways and movement networks in archaeology: an overview of current approaches
Verhagen, P., Nuninger, L., & Groenhuijzen, M. R. (2019) · Computational Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04576-0_11 · Cited by 117
Assessing the state of archaeological GIS research: Unbinding analyses of past landscapes
Howey, M. C. L., & Brouwer Burg, M. (2017) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2017.05.002 · Cited by 85
Connectivity modelling in conservation science: a comparative evaluation
Unnithan Kumar, S., & Cushman, S. A. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20370-w · Cited by 83
The “healthy dose” of nature: A cautionary tale
Bell, S. L., Leyshon, C., Foley, R., & Kearns, R. A. (2019) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/gec3.12415 · Cited by 70
Bruno Latour and the anthropology of the moderns
Berliner, D., Legrain, L., & van de Port, M. (2013) · Social Anthropology · doi:10.1111/1469-8676.12051 · Cited by 29
The Map and the Territory: An Ethnographic Study of the Low Utilisation of a Global eHealth Network
Duclos, V. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2016.3 · Cited by 15
Zaman, A., & Gogoi, J. (2026) · TEXTILE · doi:10.1080/14759756.2026.2645887
Metadata
- Authors
- Ingold, T.
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2011-04-19
- Cited by
- 2,621
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review