Cited by 378Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Group Field Theory: An Overview

Open access
Freidel, L.·2005·International Journal of Theoretical Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10773-005-8894-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Freidel's proposal uses tree-level group field theory amplitudes to define the physical inner product of quantum gravity.

    “A prescription that avoids this last issue is the radical proposal of Freidel [179], where the tree-level GFT amplitudes are used to define the physical inner product of quantum gravity.”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [179]

  • The spin foam functional W|Γ5,j,i> can be expanded in a formal perturbative vertex expansion in the parameter λ of a Group Field Theory.

    “The sum over two-complexes can be implemented in terms of a formal perturbative expansion in the parameter λ of a Group Field Theory [46]:”

    From LQG propagator from the new spin foams (2009) · cites this paper as [46]

  • The interaction vertex (10j symbol, or Barrett-Crane vertex amplitude) has been shown to include, beside the 'good' term approximating the exponential of the Einstein-Hilbert action, two 'bad' terms: an exponential with opposite sign giving the cosine of the Regge action, and a dominant term depending on the existence of degenerate four-simplices.

    “The physical correctness of these theories has been questioned because in the low-energy limit their interaction vertex (10 j symbol, or Barrett-Crane vertex amplitude) has been shown to include -beside the 'good' term approximating the exponential of the Einstein-Hilbert action [19]- also two 'bad' terms: an exponential with opposite sign, giving the cosine of Regge action [19] (analogous to the”
  • In GFT, the initial big-bang singularity is replaced by a regular bounce, followed by an era of accelerated expansion.

    “In particular, the initial big-bang singularity is replaced by a regular bounce (see Ref. [1, 2]), followed by an era of accelerated expansion [2].”
  • In the non-interacting GFT case, the Universe expands indefinitely and in the limit φ→∞ its dynamics follows the ordinary Friedmann equation for a flat Universe filled with a massless and minimally coupled scalar field.

    “In that case one has that the Universe expands indefinitely and in the limit φ →∞ its dynamics follows the ordinary Friedmann equation for a flat Universe, filled with a massless and minimally coupled scalar field.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 378

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [6]Ponzano, G. and Regge, T. ' Semiclassical limit of Racah coefficients,' in Spectroscopic and Group Theoretical Methods in Physics, Racah Memorial Volume, F. Block et al. (eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam 1968.
  2. [15]K. Noui and A. Perez, 'Three dimensional loop quantum gravity: Physical scalar product and spin foam models,' Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 1739 [arXiv:gr-qc/0402110]. · arXiv
  3. [32]R. Gambini and J. Pullin, 'A finite spin-foam-based theory of three and four dimensional quantum gravity,' Phys. Rev. D 66 , 024020 (2002) [arXiv:gr-qc/0111089]. · arXiv
  4. [36]L. Freidel and D. Louapre, Phys. Rev. D 68 , 104004 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0211026]. · arXiv
  5. [39]F. Markopoulou, 'Coarse graining in spin foam models,' Class. Quant. Grav. 20 , 777 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0203036]. · arXiv

Authors
Freidel, L.
Affiliations
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Freidel, L.
Venue
International Journal of Theoretical Physics
Published
2005-10
Volume
44
Issue
10
Pages
1769-1783
ISSN
  • 0020-7748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9575
OpenAlex
W2167913745
Cited by
378
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 29
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Theoretical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
group field theory, quantum gravity, matrix models, higher-dimensional generalization, third quantization, quantum field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review