CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13Climate Change Policy and EconomicsIron and Steelmaking ProcessesEU Law and Policy Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on steel decarbonization in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective on ambition vs. equity

Open access
Das, Kasturi, Bandyopadhyay, Kaushik Ranjan·2025·International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
DOI 10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists are queued

They are fetched later and appear here then.

References 33 · Cited by 13

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Bendiek, A., & Römer, M. (2019). Externalizing Europe: The global effects of European data protection. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2018-0038 · DOI
  2. Böheim, M., & Friesenbichler, K. S. (2016). Exporting the competition policy regime of the European Union: Success or failure? Empirical evidence for acceding countries. Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(3), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12321 · DOI
  3. Bradford, A. (2012). The Brussels effect. Northwestern University Law Review, 107(1), 1–68.
  4. Bradford, A., Chilton, A., Linos, K., & Weaver, A. (2019). The global dominance of European competition law over American antitrust law. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 16(4), 731–766. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12239 · DOI
  5. Clora, F., Yu, W., & Corong, E. (2023). Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses: Aggregate and within-coalition results. Energy Policy, 174, 113454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113454 · DOI
  6. Cooreman, B. (2017). Global environmental protection through trade: A systematic approach to extraterritoriality. Edward Elgar Publishing. · DOI
  7. Curzi, D., Luarasi, M., Raimondi, V., & Olper, A. (2018). The (lack of) international harmonization of EU standards: Import and export effects in developed versus developing countries. Applied Economics Letters, 25(21), 1552–1556. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1430327 · DOI
  8. Das, K. (2015). Climate clubs: Carrots, sticks and more. Economic and Political Weekly, 50(34), 24–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24482588
  9. Das, K., van Asselt, H., Droege, S. & Mehling, M (2019). Making the international trade system work for Paris agreement: Assessing the options. Environmental Law Reporter, 49(6), 10553–80, Environmental Law Institute, Washington, DC, USA, . SKU: article-289590
  10. Deane, F., & Brockett, C. (2023). Carbon border adjustments: A legal tool for mitigation or a barrier to justice? Climate Law, 13(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-bja10038 · DOI
  11. Eicke, L., & De Blasio, N. (2022). The future of green hydrogen value chains—Geopolitical and market implication in the industrial sector. Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, October 5. · DOI
  12. Eicke, L., Weko, S., Apergi, M., & Marian, A. (2021). Pulling up the carbon ladder? Decarbonization, dependence, and third-country risks from the European carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Research and Social Science, 80, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102240 · DOI
  13. Esty, D. C. (2009). Revitalizing global environmental governance for climate change. Global Governance, 15, 427–434. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27800771 · DOI
  14. European Commission (EC) (2007a). Commission staff working document on the external dimension of the single market review. SEC (2007) 1519 (Nov. 20).
  15. Grubb, M. (2011). International climate finance from border carbon cost levelling. Climate Policy., 11(3), 157. · DOI
  16. Gu, R., Guo, J., Huang, Y., & Wu, X. (2023). Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on economic growth and resources supply in the BASIC countries. Resources Policy, Volume 85, Part B, August. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104034 · DOI
  17. Hölscher, J., & Stephan, J. (2009). Competition and antitrust policy in the enlarged European Union: A level playing field? Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4), 863–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02008.x · DOI
  18. Holzer, K., & Kopytsia, I. (2023). Legal challenges of tracing carbon emissions in steel trade. Korea Europe Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Politics, Society, and Economics, 4 (August). https://doi.org/10.48770/ker.2023.no4.23 · DOI
  19. Lim, B., Hong, K., Yoon, J., Chang, J. I., & Cheong, I. (2021). Pitfalls of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energies, 14(21), 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303 · DOI
  20. Lin, B., & Zhao, H. (2023). Evaluating current effects of upcoming EU carbon border adjustment mechanism: Evidence from China’s futures market. Energy Policy, 177, 113573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113573 · DOI
  21. Magacho, G., Espagne, E., & Godin, A. (2024). Impacts of the CBAM on EU trade partners: Consequences for developing countries. Climate Policy, 24(2), 243–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2023.2200758 · DOI
  22. Mahieu, R., Asghari, H., Parsons, C., van Hoboken, J., et al. (2021). Measuring the Brussels effect through access requests: Has the European general data protection regulation influenced the data protection rights of Canadian citizens? Journal of Information Policy, 11, 301–349. https://doi.org/10.5325/jinfopoli.11.2021.0301 · DOI
  23. Mallett, A., & Pal, P. (2022). Green transformation in the iron and steel industry in India: Rethinking patterns of innovation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 44, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100968 · DOI
  24. Mehling, M., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C. (2019). Designing border carbon adjustments for enhanced climate action. American Journal of International Law, American Society of International Law and Cambridge University Press, 113(3), 433–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.22 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mörsdorf, G. (2022). A simple fix for carbon leakage? Assessing the environmental effectiveness of the EU carbon border adjustment. Energy Policy, 161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112596 · DOI
  26. Overland, I., & Sabyrbekov, R. (2022). Know your opponent: Which countries might fight the European carbon border adjustment mechanism? Energy Policy, 169, 113175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113175 · DOI
  27. Perdana, S., & Vielle, M. (2022). Making the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism acceptable and climate friendly for least developed countries. Energy Policy, 170, 113245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113245 · DOI
  28. Petersmann, E. (2023). European economic and environmental constitutionalism as Driver for UN and WTO sustainable development reforms, European University Institute. Department of Law, LAW Working Paper 2023/5. · DOI
  29. Preusse, V., Purnhagen, K. P., & Dries, L. (2020). The Brussels effect in action: Do the EU's standards travel abroad? A Study on Control Systems for Geographical Indications in the EU and Thailand. Campus Kulmbach Legal Working Paper. · DOI
  30. Rodrigues, N. C. (Ed.) (2021). Extraterritoriality of EU economic law: The application of EU economic law outside the territory of the EU, European Union and its neighbours in a globalized world, Volume 4, Springer Nature, Switzerland.
  31. Tarr, D. G., Kuznetsov, D. E., Overland, I., & Vakulchuk, R. (2023). Why carbon border adjustment mechanisms will not save the planet but a climate club and subsidies for transformative green technologies may. Energy Economics, 122, 106695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106695 · DOI
  32. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI). (2023). Financing decarbonization of the secondary steel sector in India: towards an enabling environment. New Delhi.
  33. UNCTAD. (2021). A European union carbon border adjustment mechanism: Implications for developing countries. UNCTAD.
  34. Wu, H. (2020). Territorial extension of the EU environmental law and its impacts on emerging industrial economies: A Taiwan case. China & WTO Review, 2, 325–350. https://doi.org/10.14330/cwr.2020.6.2.04 · DOI
  35. Zhong, J., & Pei, J. (2022). Beggar thy neighbor? On the competitiveness and welfare impacts of the EU’s proposed carbon border adjustment mechanism. Energy Policy, 162, 112802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112802 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Das, K., & Bandyopadhyay, K. R.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Management Technology (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Management Lucknow (IN)
Corresponding author
Das, Kasturi
ORCID
Venue
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-01-24
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
195-229
ISSN
  • 1567-9764 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1553
DOI
10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4
OpenAlex
W4406799948
Cited by
13
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Metals and Alloys › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
  • Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
Keywords
CBAM, border carbon adjustment, steel industry decarbonization, Indian steel industry, Brussels effect, carbon leakage, EU trade policy, hard-to-abate sectors, small and medium-sized enterprises, Global South, stakeholder perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on steel decarbonization in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective on ambition vs. equity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4
The paper
Das, K., & Bandyopadhyay, K. R. (2025). Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) on steel decarbonization in India: a multi-stakeholder perspective on ambition vs. equity. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-025-09662-4