Cited by 216Climate Change Policy and EconomicsInternational Environmental Law and PoliciesWorld Trade Organization Law

Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action

Open access
Mehling, Michael A., van Asselt, Harro, Das, Kasturi, Droege, Susanne, Verkuijl, Cleo·2019·American Journal of International Law

Abstract

Abstract The Paris Agreement advances a heterogeneous approach to international climate cooperation. Such an approach may be undermined by carbon leakage—the displacement of emissions from states with more to less stringent climate policy constraints. Border carbon adjustments offer a promising response to leakage, but they also raise concerns about their compatibility with international trade law. This Article provides a comprehensive analysis of border carbon adjustments and proposes a way to design them that balances legal, administrative, and environmental considerations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/ajil.2019.22

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BCA proposals have been floated not only as a measure to combat leakage but also as a means to secure greater cooperation: to avoid tariffs, other nations could adopt equivalent emissions pricing.

    “BCA proposals have been floated not only as a measure to combat leakage but also as a means to secure greater cooperation: to avoid tariffs, other nations could adopt equivalent emissions pricing 73,74 .”
  • Key constraints for climate policies targeting heavily traded products arise from potential international repercussions, especially from incompatibilities with international trade law.

    “Key constraints for climate policies targeting heavily traded products arise from potential international repercussions, especially from incompatibilities with international trade law.”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Analyses of the WTO compatibility of BCAs suggest that a BCA can in principle be designed and implemented in accordance with international trade law, but the details would matter and differ from the elegant theoretical solution with full symmetry.

    “Analyses of the WTO compatibility of BCAs (80, 94-99) suggest that it can in principle be designed and implemented in accordance with international trade law, but the details would matter and differ from the elegant theoretical solution with full symmetry.”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

  • BCAs could take the form of a tax, a tariff, or an obligation to procure emissions permits.

    “BCAs could take on the form of a tax, a tariff, or an obligation to procure emissions permits (80).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

  • A meta-analysis finds that without export rebates, even at a carbon price of €30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk.

    “A meta-analysis (101) finds that without such export rebates, even at a carbon price of € 30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk (80, 91).”

    From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mehling, M. A., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Institute of Management Technology (IN)
  • Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE)
  • Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
Venue
American Journal of International Law
Published
2019-07
Volume
113
Issue
3
Pages
433-481
ISSN
  • 0002-9300 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-7953
OpenAlex
W2944962469
Cited by
216
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
24.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of International Law (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
KR Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
Keywords
border carbon adjustment, carbon leakage, Paris Agreement, international climate cooperation, international trade law, climate policy, trade and environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review