Designing Border Carbon Adjustments for Enhanced Climate Action
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The Paris Agreement advances a heterogeneous approach to international climate cooperation. Such an approach may be undermined by carbon leakage—the displacement of emissions from states with more to less stringent climate policy constraints. Border carbon adjustments offer a promising response to leakage, but they also raise concerns about their compatibility with international trade law. This Article provides a comprehensive analysis of border carbon adjustments and proposes a way to design them that balances legal, administrative, and environmental considerations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BCA proposals have been floated not only as a measure to combat leakage but also as a means to secure greater cooperation: to avoid tariffs, other nations could adopt equivalent emissions pricing.
“BCA proposals have been floated not only as a measure to combat leakage but also as a means to secure greater cooperation: to avoid tariffs, other nations could adopt equivalent emissions pricing 73,74 .”
From Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments (2022) · cites this paper as [73]
Key constraints for climate policies targeting heavily traded products arise from potential international repercussions, especially from incompatibilities with international trade law.
“Key constraints for climate policies targeting heavily traded products arise from potential international repercussions, especially from incompatibilities with international trade law.”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Analyses of the WTO compatibility of BCAs suggest that a BCA can in principle be designed and implemented in accordance with international trade law, but the details would matter and differ from the elegant theoretical solution with full symmetry.
“Analyses of the WTO compatibility of BCAs (80, 94-99) suggest that it can in principle be designed and implemented in accordance with international trade law, but the details would matter and differ from the elegant theoretical solution with full symmetry.”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
BCAs could take the form of a tax, a tariff, or an obligation to procure emissions permits.
“BCAs could take on the form of a tax, a tariff, or an obligation to procure emissions permits (80).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
A meta-analysis finds that without export rebates, even at a carbon price of €30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk.
“A meta-analysis (101) finds that without such export rebates, even at a carbon price of € 30/t, approximately 10% of EU exports would face significant cost increases and leakage risk (80, 91).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Exempting exporters from carbon pricing through rebates could constitute a prohibited subsidy under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and undermine the environmental defense of a measure.
“Exempting exporters from carbon pricing through rebates could constitute a prohibited subsidy under the WTO Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (ASCM), and undermine the environmental defense of a measure (80).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Choices on benchmarked versus actual embodied emissions to calculate the adjustment matter and bring complex implications and diverse views about the impact on compatibility with WTO principles.
“Choices on benchmarked versus actual embodied emissions to calculate the adjustment matter (see Section 4.3) and bring complex implications and diverse views about the impact on compatibility with WTO principles (80).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
The Waxman-Markey bill left the question of which countries have assumed their fair share up to US decision-makers, which is highly problematic in relation to basic WTO principles and UNFCCC principles on common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities.
“In other words, it left the question of which countries have assumed their fair share up to US decision-makers, which is highly problematic in relation to basic WTO principles (80), as well as in light of the UNFCCC principles on common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities (80).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Cites
Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C
Rogelj, J., den Elzen, M., Höhne, N., Fransen, T., Fekete, H., Winkler, H., Schaeffer, R., Sha, F., Riahi, K., & Meinshausen, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature18307 · Cited by 3,480 · see citing works
Border tax adjustment: a feasible way to support stringent emission trading
Ismer, R., & Neuhoff, K. (2007) · European Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1007/s10657-007-9032-8 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Addressing leakage in the EU ETS: Border adjustment or output-based allocation?
Monjon, S., & Quirion, P. (2011) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.04.020 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
EU emissions trading and the cement sector: a spatial competition analysis
PONSSARD, J. P., & WALKER, N. (2008) · Climate Policy · doi:10.3763/cpol.2007.0500 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
The Strategic Value of Carbon Tariffs
Böhringer, C., Carbone, J. C., & Rutherford, T. F. (2016) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20130327 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
THE DESIGN OF BORDER ADJUSTMENTS FOR CARBON PRICES
Kortum, S., & Weisbach, D. (2017) · National Tax Journal · doi:10.17310/ntj.2017.2.07 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
The legal interface between carbon border measures and trade rules
Tamiotti, L. (2011) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2011.592672 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Potential impacts and challenges of border carbon adjustments
Böhringer, C., Fischer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Rutherford, T. F. (2022) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-021-01250-z · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade
Grubb, M., Jordan, N. D., Hertwich, E., Neuhoff, K., Das, K., Bandyopadhyay, K. R., van Asselt, H., Sato, M., Wang, R., Pizer, W. A., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-120820-053625 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Self-citationEquity implications of net zero visions
Lenzi, D., Jakob, M., Honegger, M., Droege, S., Heyward, J. C., & Kruger, T. (2021) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-021-03270-2 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationBeggs, P. J., Trueck, S., Linnenluecke, M. K., Bambrick, H., Capon, A. G., Hanigan, I. C., Arriagada, N. B., Cross, T. J., Friel, S., Green, D., et al. (2024) · Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/mja2.52245 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Jordan, N. D., & Bleischwitz, R. (2020) · Global Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.glt.2020.01.002 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mehling, M. A., van Asselt, H., Das, K., Droege, S., & Verkuijl, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Strathclyde (GB)
- Institute of Management Technology (IN)
- Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, German Institute for International and Security Affairs (DE)
- Stockholm Environment Institute (GB)
- Venue
- American Journal of International Law
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 433-481
- ISSN
- 0002-9300 (ISSN-L)
- 2161-7953
- OpenAlex
- W2944962469
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 24.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Journal of International Law (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- KR Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › World Trade Organization Law
- Keywords
- border carbon adjustment, carbon leakage, Paris Agreement, international climate cooperation, international trade law, climate policy, trade and environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review