Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 16

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coverage-based search result diversification

Zheng, Wei, Wang, Xuanhui, Fang, Hui, Cheng, Hong·2012·Information Retrieval

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10791-011-9178-4

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Clarke, C. L. A., Craswell, N., & Soboroff, I. (2009). Overview of the trec 2009 web track. In Proceedings of TREC’09.
  2. Clarke, C. L. A., Craswell, N., Soboroff, I., & Cormack, G. V. (2010). Preliminary overview of the trec 2010 web track. In Proceedings of TREC’10.
  3. Craswell, N., Fetterly, D., Najork, M., Robertson, S., & Yilmaz, E. (2009). Microsoft research at trec 2009. In Proceedings of TREC’09.
  4. Macdonald, C., Wang, J., & Clarke, C. (2011). Ecir2011 ddr workshop proceedings. In Proceedings of DDR’11, 2011.
  5. Santos, R. L., & Ounis, I. (2011). Diversifying for multiple information needs. In Proceedings of DDR’11.
  6. Zheng, W., & Fang, H. (2011). A comparative study of search result diversification methods. In Proceedings of DDR’11.

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, W., Wang, X., Fang, H., & Cheng, H.
Venue
Information Retrieval
Published
2011-11-17
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
433-457
ISSN
  • 1386-4564
  • 1573-7659
Cited by
16
References
46
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coverage-based search result diversification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10791-011-9178-4
The paper
Zheng, W., Wang, X., Fang, H., & Cheng, H. (2012). Coverage-based search result diversification. Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-011-9178-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.