Cited by 17Handwritten Text Recognition TechniquesVehicle License Plate RecognitionImage and Object Detection Techniques

An enhanced text detection technique for the visually impaired to read text

Joan, S. P. Faustina, Valli, S.·2017·Information Systems Frontiers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-016-9699-x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joan, S. P. F., & Valli, S.
Affiliations
Anna University, Chennai (IN)
Corresponding author
Joan, S. P. Faustina
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2016-09-20
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1039-1056
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W2521748545
Cited by
17
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Vehicle License Plate Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
Keywords
text detection, visually impaired people, assistive technology, MSER, PHOG, stroke width, born-digital documents, scene text

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review