Cited by 47AI in Service InteractionsCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltySocial Robot Interaction and HRI

How Do Artificial Intelligence Chatbots Affect Customer Purchase? Uncovering the Dual Pathways of Anthropomorphism on Service Evaluation

Li, Yang, Gan, Zhenghua, Zheng, Bowen·2025·Information Systems Frontiers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10796-023-10438-x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Li, Y., Gan, Z., & Zheng, B.
Affiliations
  • Hefei University of Technology (CN)
  • Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zheng, Bowen
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2023-10-23
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
283-300
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W4387874239
Cited by
47
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 4
FWCI
26.07
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (72002062)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, anthropomorphism, purchase decision, service evaluation, trust in chatbots, behavioral beliefs, social information processing theory, customer service automation, online shopping

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review