Cited by 94Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

The Best Friend and Friendship Group Influence on Adolescent Nonsuicidal Self-injury

You, Jianing, Lin, Min Pei, Fu, Kei, Leung, Freedom·2013·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

This study examined associations of peer socialization and selection, over time, with nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) among 5,787 (54.2 % females) Chinese community adolescents. Both effects were tested using two aspects of adolescents' friendship networks: the best friend and the friendship group. Participants completed questionnaires assessing NSSI, depressive symptoms and maladaptive impulsive behaviors at two waves of time over a 6-month period. Results showed that even after controlling for the effects of depressive symptoms and maladaptive impulsive behaviors, the best friends' engagement in NSSI still significantly predicted adolescents' own engagement in NSSI. Adolescents' friendship groups' NSSI status also significantly predicted their own NSSI status and frequency. Additionally, adolescents with NSSI tended to join peer groups with other members also engaging in NSSI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-013-9734-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging longitudinal evidence suggests that a friend's suicide is a meaningful predictor of an adolescent's own risk for future NSSI and suicidal behavior.

    “some emerging longitudinal evidence suggests that a friend’s suicide is a meaningful predictor of an adolescent’s own risk for future NSSI (Giletta et al. 2013, Prinstein et al. 2010, You et al. 2013) and suicidal behavior (e.g., Liu 2006)”

    From Adolescent Suicide as a Failure of Acute Stress-Response Systems. (2019) · cites this paper as You et al. 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
You, J., Lin, M. P., Fu, K., & Leung, F.
Affiliations
  • South China Normal University (CN)
  • National Taiwan Normal University (TW)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
You, Jianing
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2013-03-10
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
993-1004
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2093687908
Cited by
94
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, best friends, friendship groups, peer socialization, peer selection, adolescent peer relationships, depressive symptoms, Chinese adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Hong Kong, Humans, Male, Peer Group, Social Identification, Socialization, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Self-Injurious Behavior, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review