Cited by 234Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Peer Influence and Nonsuicidal Self Injury: Longitudinal Results in Community and Clinically-Referred Adolescent Samples

Open access
Prinstein, Mitchell J., Heilbron, Nicole, Guerry, John D., Franklin, Joseph C., Rancourt, Diana, Simon, Valerie, Spirito, Anthony·2010·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Research suggests that adolescents' engagement in nonsuicidal self-injurious (NSSI) behaviors may be increasing over time, yet little is known regarding distal longitudinal factors that may promote engagement in these behaviors. Data from two longitudinal studies are presented to examine whether NSSI may be associated with peer influence processes. Study 1 included 377 adolescents from a community-based sample; Study 2 included 140 clinically-referred adolescents recruited from a psychiatric inpatient facility. In Study 1, adolescents' NSSI was examined at baseline and one year later. Adolescents' nominated best friend reported their own levels of NSSI. In Study 2, adolescents' NSSI was examined at baseline as well as 9 and 18-months post-baseline. Adolescents' perceptions of their friends' engagement in self-injurious behavior (including suicidality) and depressed mood also were examined at all three time points. Baseline depressive symptoms were measured in both studies; gender and age were examined as moderators of peer influence effects. Results from both studies supported longitudinal peer socialization effects of friends' self-injurious behavior on adolescents' own NSSI for girls, but not for boys, even after controlling for depressive symptoms as a predictor. Study 1 suggested socialization effects mostly for younger youth. Results from Study 2 also suggested longitudinal socialization effects, as well as peer selection effects; adolescents' NSSI was associated with increasing perceptions of their friends' engagement in depressive/self-injurious thoughts and behavior. Findings contribute to the nascent literature on longitudinal predictors of NSSI and to work on peer influence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-010-9423-0

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emerging longitudinal evidence suggests that a friend's suicide is a meaningful predictor of an adolescent's own risk for future NSSI and suicidal behavior.

    “some emerging longitudinal evidence suggests that a friend’s suicide is a meaningful predictor of an adolescent’s own risk for future NSSI (Giletta et al. 2013, Prinstein et al. 2010, You et al. 2013) and suicidal behavior (e.g., Liu 2006)”

    From Adolescent Suicide as a Failure of Acute Stress-Response Systems. (2019) · cites this paper as Prinstein et al. 2010

    Study 2 Methods reports asking adolescents whether close friends had attempted suicide, not whether a friend had died by suicide. The General Discussion reports that friends’ self-harm predicted later NSSI among girls, but not boys. Thus the paper supports a narrower longitudinal peer-influence finding, not the claim that a friend’s suicide predicts NSSI; the citing sentence attributes the separate suicidal-behavior claim to Liu (2006). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinstein, M. J., Heilbron, N., Guerry, J. D., Franklin, J. C., Rancourt, D., Simon, V., & Spirito, A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Prinstein, Mitchell J.
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2010-05-02
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
669-682
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2140706832
Cited by
234
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH085505, R01MH059766, R01 MH 59766)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
non-suicidal self-injury, peer influence, peer socialization, peer selection, adolescents, depressive symptoms, gender differences, age differences, suicidality, psychiatric inpatients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Social Environment, Self-Injurious Behavior, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review