Cited by 34Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cool and Hot Aspects of Executive Function in Childhood Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Hybel, Katja Anna, Mortensen, Erik Lykke, Lambek, Rikke, Thastum, Mikael, Thomsen, Per Hove·2017·Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

Abstract

Aspects of executive functioning (EF) have been put forward as endophenotypes in obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD) and meta-analyses support EF underperformance in adult samples. Childhood-onset OCD has been suggested to constitute a separate neurodevelopmental subtype of the disorder but studies on neuropsychological functioning in childhood OCD are limited. The aim of the present study was to investigate performance-based EF in pediatric OCD using observed and latent variable analyses. A case-control design was applied including 50 unmedicated children and adolescents with OCD aged 7-17 years of which 70% were female, 50 pairwise age and gender matched non-psychiatric controls (NP) and 38 children and adolescents with mixed anxiety disorders (MA). Participants underwent structured diagnostic interviews and assessment with a battery encompassing cool EF tasks of working memory, set shifting, inhibition, and planning, and hot EF tasks of decision making and dot probe paradigm affective interference. First, groups were compared on observed variables with multilevel mixed-effects linear regression and analysis of variance. Then the latent structure of cool EF was tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and groups were compared on the CFA scores. No significant differences between groups appeared on individual cool EF tasks. On the hot EF tasks the OCD group displayed significant interference effects on the dot probe paradigm OCD-specific stimuli relative to NP, but not compared to MA and no group differences emerged for decision making. In the CFA a one-factor solution showed best fit, but the groups did not differ significantly on the resulting latent variable. The present study does not support cool or hot EF impairments in childhood OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10802-016-0229-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research in children has failed to find SST performance differences when comparing youth with OCD to typically developing controls and children with autism spectrum disorder and anxiety disorders.

    “Research in children has failed to find SST performance differences when comparing youth with OCD to typically developing controls (Gooskens et al., 2019; Hybel et al., 2017; Rubia et al., 2010) and children with autism spectrum disorder (Gooskens et al., 2019) and anxiety disorders (Hybel et al., 2017).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 92 · Cited by 34

Authors
Hybel, K. A., Mortensen, E. L., Lambek, R., Thastum, M., & Thomsen, P. H.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Hybel, Katja Anna
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Published
2016-11-12
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
1195-1205
ISSN
  • 0091-0627 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2835
OpenAlex
W2550767605
Cited by
34
References
92
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • The Danish Council for independent Research, Medical Sciences (0602-00306B)
  • The Research Fund for Psychiatric Research, Central Denmark Region
  • The Fru C. Hermansens Memorial Foundation (00962-0001)
  • The, A.P. Møller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science (14-166)
  • The G.J.’s Foundation (70355 MT/IV)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
executive function, endophenotypes, cool executive function, hot executive function, dot-probe task, emotional interference, decision-making, working memory, set-shifting, inhibition, planning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Thinking, Case-Control Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review