Cited by 72Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesFamily and Disability Support Research

Screening for autism spectrum disorders in Flemish day-care centres with the checklist for early signs of developmental disorders

Open access
Dereu, Mieke, Warreyn, Petra, Raymaekers, Ruth, Meirsschaut, Mieke, Pattyn, Griet, Schietecatte, Inge, Roeyers, Herbert·2010·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

A new screening instrument for ASD was developed that can be filled out by child care workers: the Checklist for Early Signs of Developmental Disorders (CESDD). The predictive validity of the CESDD was evaluated in a population of 6,808 children between 3 and 39 months attending day-care centres in Flanders. The CESDD had a sensitivity of .80 and a specificity of .94. Based on the screening procedure used in this study, 41 children were diagnosed with ASD or got a working diagnosis of ASD. Thus, including child care workers' report on signs of ASD in screening procedures can help to identify cases of ASD at a young age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-010-0984-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Institutional Review Board required active consent from caregivers before teachers completed screening forms, rather than an opt-out approach used in prior literature.

    “our Institutional Review Board required active consent from caregivers before we asked teachers to complete screening forms, rather than a “opt-out” approach that was used in prior literature (e.g., Dereu et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dereu, M., Warreyn, P., Raymaekers, R., Meirsschaut, M., Pattyn, G., Schietecatte, I., & Roeyers, H.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Dereu, Mieke
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
1247-1258
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2095260203
Cited by
72
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, early screening, childcare workers, daycare centers, predictive validity, sensitivity and specificity, early detection
MeSH terms
Belgium, Child Day Care Centers, Developmental Disabilities, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Humans, Mass Screening, Population Surveillance, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review