Cited by 7Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

Comment on: “An intervention for sensory difficulties in children with autism: a randomized trial” by Schaaf et al. (2013)

Ashburner, Jill K., Rodger, Sylvia A., Ziviani, Jenny M., Hinder, Elizabeth A.·2014·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

The purpose of this letter to the editor is to comment on a recently published paper in the Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 'An Intervention for Sensory Difficulties in Children with Autism: A Randomized Trial' by Schaaf et al. (2013). The authors are commended for undertaking a randomised clinical trial (RCT) examining the efficacy of occupational therapy using sensory integration (OT/SI). The study complies with many of the recommended standards of RCT's including: (a) detailed eligibility criteria, (b) well-matched experimental and control groups, (c) use of gold-standard instruments to measure the symptoms of autism spectrum disorder, (d) the use of functionally relevant outcome measures, (e) fidelity checking, and (f) manualization of the intervention. Additional aspects of rigour that could be considered in subsequent research include: (a) independent blinded measure of observational outcomes, (b) treatment and control interventions of equivalent dose, (c) public access to the manualized treatment guidelines, and (d) the use of a comparison occupational therapy intervention to address the same goals as the OT/SI intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-014-2083-0

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A strong and positive correlation has been observed between difficulties in sensory processing and executive function deficits in various populations, such as premature children, children with autism spectrum disorders, and children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

    “A strong and positive correlation has also been observed between difficulties in sensory processing and executive function deficits in various populations, such as premature children (21–23), children with ASDs (24–26), and children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (27–29).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashburner, J. K., Rodger, S. A., Ziviani, J. M., & Hinder, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Autism CRC (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Ashburner, Jill K.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2014-03-08
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1486-1488
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W1973286888
Cited by
7
References
15
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory integration, occupational therapy, sensory difficulties, intervention efficacy, randomized controlled trial methodology, intervention fidelity, manualized intervention
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Sensation Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review