Cited by 208Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationChildren's Physical and Motor Development

Use of Machine Learning to Identify Children with Autism and Their Motor Abnormalities

Crippa, Alessandro, Salvatore, Christian, Perego, Paolo, Forti, Sara, Nobile, Maria, Molteni, Massimo, Castiglioni, Isabella·2015·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

In the present work, we have undertaken a proof-of-concept study to determine whether a simple upper-limb movement could be useful to accurately classify low-functioning children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 2-4. To answer this question, we developed a supervised machine-learning method to correctly discriminate 15 preschool children with ASD from 15 typically developing children by means of kinematic analysis of a simple reach-to-drop task. Our method reached a maximum classification accuracy of 96.7% with seven features related to the goal-oriented part of the movement. These preliminary findings offer insight into a possible motor signature of ASD that may be potentially useful in identifying a well-defined subset of patients, reducing the clinical heterogeneity within the broad behavioral phenotype.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-015-2379-8

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crippa, A., Salvatore, C., Perego, P., Forti, S., Nobile, M., Molteni, M., & Castiglioni, I.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Eugenio Medea (IT)
  • Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology (IT)
Corresponding author
Crippa, Alessandro
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2015-02-05
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
2146-2156
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2085724875
Cited by
208
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, low-functioning children, motor abnormalities, upper limb movement, kinematic analysis, ASD classification, preschool children, clinical heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Machine Learning, Biomechanical Phenomena, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Upper Extremity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review