Cited by 297Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysis

Identifying children with autism spectrum disorder based on their face processing abnormality: a machine learning framework

Liu, Wenbo, Li, Ming, Yi, Li·2016·Autism Research

Abstract

The atypical face scanning patterns in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has been repeatedly discovered by previous research. The present study examined whether their face scanning patterns could be potentially useful to identify children with ASD by adopting the machine learning algorithm for the classification purpose. Particularly, we applied the machine learning method to analyze an eye movement dataset from a face recognition task [Yi et al., 2016], to classify children with and without ASD. We evaluated the performance of our model in terms of its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of classifying ASD. Results indicated promising evidence for applying the machine learning algorithm based on the face scanning patterns to identify children with ASD, with a maximum classification accuracy of 88.51%. Nevertheless, our study is still preliminary with some constraints that may apply in the clinical practice. Future research should shed light on further valuation of our method and contribute to the development of a multitask and multimodel approach to aid the process of early detection and diagnosis of ASD. Autism Res 2016, 9: 888–898 . © 2016 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1615

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, W., Li, M., & Yi, L.
Affiliations
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Ming
  • Yi, Li
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
888-898
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W2328587688
Cited by
297
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8
FWCI
9.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571135, 31200779, 61401524)
  • Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Province (2014A030313123)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, face processing, eye movement patterns, facial scanning, ASD classification, children, early diagnosis, machine learning classification
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Machine Learning, Algorithms, Child, Child, Preschool, China, Eye Movements, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Visual Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review