Cited by 56Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Low but Increasing Prevalence of Autism Spectrum Disorders in a French Area from Register-Based Data

van Bakel, Marit Maria Elisabeth, Delobel-Ayoub, Malika, Cans, Christine, Assouline, Brigitte, Jouk, Pierre-Simon, Raynaud, Jean-Philippe, Arnaud, Catherine·2015·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Register-based prevalence rates of childhood autism (CA), Asperger's syndrome (AS) and other autism spectrum disorders (ASD) were calculated among children aged 7 years old of the 1997-2003 birth cohorts, living in four counties in France. The proportion of children presenting comorbidities was reported. 1123 children with ASD were recorded (M/F ratio: 4.1), representing an overall prevalence rate of 36.5/10,000 children (95 % CI 34.4-38.7): 8.8/10,000 for CA (95 % CI 7.8-9.9), 1.7/10,000 for AS (95 % CI 1.3-2.3) and 25.9/10,000 for other ASD (95 % CI 24.2-27.8). ASD prevalence significantly increased (p < 0.0001) during the period under study. The proportion of children with an intellectual disability was 47.3 %, all other comorbidities were present in less than 5 % of the cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-015-2486-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cohort effects have been observed in France, where ASD prevalence was higher among children born in 2003 relative to those born in 1997.

    “Cohort effects have also been observed in France where prevalence was higher among children born in 2003 relative to those born in 1997 (van Bakel et al., 2015).”

    From Global prevalence of autism: A systematic review update (2022) · cites this paper as van Bakel et al., 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Bakel, M. M. E., Delobel-Ayoub, M., Cans, C., Assouline, B., Jouk, P.-S., Raynaud, J.-P., & Arnaud, C.
Affiliations
  • Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2015-06-06
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
3255-3261
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W646553158
Cited by
56
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, childhood autism, Asperger syndrome, prevalence, temporal trends, comorbidities, intellectual disability, birth cohort, France
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, France, Humans, Male, Registries, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review