Evaluation of Visual Pedagogy in Dental Check-ups and Preventive Practices Among 6–12-Year-Old Children with Autism
Abstract
This study was aimed to evaluate the impact of visual pedagogy in dental check-ups and preventive practices among children with autism aged 6-12. In this randomized double-blind clinical trial, the cooperation of 40 children with autism age 6-12. The selected children were equally divided into two groups of case and control (n = 20). The obtained data were analyzed by statistical tests, including Chi square and independent t test. The results of Cochran showed a significant increase in children's cooperation with regard to fluoride therapy in the case group by repeating the visit and training sessions (p ≤ 0.001). The findings of this study demonstrated, visual pedagogy was merely effective in the case of fluoride therapy in the case group.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies support the creation of special dental visual aids that mimic actual dental settings, allowing children to get familiar with the environment they will encounter.
“Previous studies reported in the literature supported the creation of special dental visual aids, 27,28 that mimic actual dental settings allowing children to get familiar with the environment they will encounter.”
From Culturally Adapted Dental Visual Aids Effect on Behavior Management during Dental Visits in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cites
Dental caries experience, oral health status and treatment needs of dental patients with autism
Jaber, M. A. (2011) · Journal of Applied Oral Science · doi:10.1590/s1678-77572011000300006 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Ghanizadeh, A. (2008) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0445-6 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Aljubour, A. A., AbdElBaki, M., El Meligy, O., Al Jabri, B., & Sabbagh, H. (2024) · The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3620 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nilchian, F., Shakibaei, F., & Jarah, Z. T.
- Affiliations
- Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Nilchian, Firoozeh
- Venue
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
- Published
- 2017-01-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 858-864
- ISSN
- 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3432
- OpenAlex
- W2568330403
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical university of Esfahan
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- visual pedagogy, autism spectrum disorder, children with autism, dental check-ups, fluoride therapy, child cooperation, visual supports, pediatric dentistry
- MeSH terms
- Audiovisual Aids, Autistic Disorder, Cariostatic Agents, Child, Dental Care for Disabled, Dental Care for Persons with Disabilities, Double-Blind Method, Female, Fluorides, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Chi-Square Distribution, Dental Care for Children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
