Cited by 14Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and Disorders

Brief Report: Examining the Links Between Language Processes and Working Memory Impairments in Toddlers and Preschoolers with ASD

Open access
Edmunds, Sarah R., Colman, Carly, Vidal, Paige, Faja, Susan·2022·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Deficits in working memory have not been fully explored in toddlers and preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We investigated the relationship between language (verbal ability, verbal self-talk) and visuospatial working memory in 2- and 4-year-olds with ASD (n = 65) and typical development (TD) (n = 54). Children with ASD displayed impairments in working memory and verbal ability, but not verbal self-talk, compared to TD peers. Verbal ability and working memory were positively correlated; this association was stronger for children with ASD. For 2-year-olds, self-talk and working memory were negatively correlated. Results suggest that verbal ability and working memory are linked, especially for young children with ASD. Self-talk may be a compensatory strategy for toddlers with less developed working memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-021-05049-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses have consistently identified working memory test deficits among individuals with ASD.

    “Meta-analyses have also consistently identified deficits on tests of working memory among individuals with ASD61–63.”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The introductory passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) says school-aged children with ASD demonstrate working-memory deficits and cites a meta-analysis. It also says findings are mixed for children under eight. The paper's Results report lower working-memory scores in its own young ASD sample, but it does not establish that meta-analyses have consistently found deficits across individuals with ASD generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In ASD, working memory deficits appear greater on visuospatial tests (d>0.72) than on verbal tests (d=0.44-0.67).

    “Studies suggest greater deficits on visuospatial (d>0.72) compared to verbal (d=0.44–0.67) tests.61–63”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The paper’s background passage says working-memory deficits in school-aged children with ASD may be more pronounced for visuospatial than verbal tasks. It does not give the claimed effect sizes (d > 0.72 and d = 0.44–0.67), and its own study tested visuospatial working memory rather than comparing both types of test. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meta-analytic work found that cognitively-informed tests of executive functioning greatly improved discrimination of executive function deficits such as working memory and reaction time parameters in individuals with ASD compared to typically developing and/or ADHD groups.

    “meta-analytic work revealed that using cognitively-informed tests of executive functioning greatly improved discrimination in executive function deficits such as working memory62 and reaction time parameters68 in individuals with ASD compared to a typically developing group and/or a ADHD group.”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Results (page not provided) report lower working-memory scores in toddlers and preschoolers with ASD than in typically developing peers. But this is a primary study, not meta-analytic work, and it does not show that cognitively informed tests greatly improved discrimination. The separate reaction-time citation is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In ASD, working memory effect sizes are larger among school-aged children (d=0.62) than adolescents (d=0.20), although some meta-analyses report no age effects.

    “effect sizes are larger among school-aged children (d=0.62) compared to adolescents (d=0.20),61 although some meta-analyses report no age effects.62,63”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [62]

    The cited paper says school-aged children with ASD show working-memory deficits, but its Methods and Results concern 2- and 4-year-olds. Searches for the stated effect sizes and an adolescent comparison found neither in our copy. The separate claim about meta-analyses is attached to citations 62 and 63, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 14

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lord C, Rutter M, DiLavore PC, Risi S, Gotham K, & Bishop SL (2012a). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) Manual (Part I): Modules 1–4. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  2. Lord C, Luyster RJ, Gotham K, & Guthrie W (2012b). Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition (ADOS-2) Manual (Part II): Toddler Module. Torrance, CA: Western Psychological Services.

Authors
Edmunds, S. R., Colman, C., Vidal, P., & Faja, S.
Affiliations
Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Edmunds, Sarah R.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2021-05-06
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
1872-1880
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W3159852546
Cited by
14
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH113928)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, working memory, toddlers, preschool children, verbal ability, visuospatial working memory, linguistic processes, compensatory strategies, early childhood
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Preschool, Cognition, Humans, Language, Memory, Short-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review