The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enabling a Socio-cognitive Perspective of Mindfulness: The Development and Validation of the Langer Mindfulness Scale
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While this approach allowed for consistency in evaluating content validity, it could underestimate the value of scales developed under alternative, but still coherent, definitions of mindfulness (e.g., Pirson et al., 2018).”
From Measuring mindfulness: A systematic review and evaluation of self-report mindfulness scales (2026) · cites this paper as Pirson et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0046016 · Cited by 17,116
(1991) · Cited by 15,554
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u · Cited by 14,523
The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 · Cited by 13,448
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0040957 · Cited by 11,195
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 11,176
The structure of psychological well-being revisited.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.719 · Cited by 10,285
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Bodner, T. (2000). On the assessment of individual differences in mindful information processing: A thesis. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
- Chow, E. (2012). Mind your money: Mindfulness in socially responsible investment decision-making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
- John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory–versions 4a and 54. In. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
- Langer, E. (2009). Counter clockwise. New York: Ballantine Books.
- Langer, E. J. (1989). Mindfulness. Reading: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
- Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Thompson, M., Naccarato, M., & Parker, K. (1989). Assessing cognitive need: The development of the personal need for structure and the personal fear of invalidity scales. In CPA (Ed.), Annual meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association. Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, W. W., Yu, H., Miller, D. J., Yang, F., & Rouen, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.600739 · Cited by 74
A Humanistic Narrative for Responsible Management Learning: An Ontological Perspective
Pirson, M. A. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-020-04426-3 · Cited by 69
Self-citationUsing Attachment Theory to Conceptualize and Measure the Experiences in Human-AI Relationships
Yang, F., & Oshio, A. (2025) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-025-07917-6 · Cited by 63
Cognitive biases and mindfulness
Maymin, P. Z., & Langer, E. J. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00712-1 · Cited by 46
Self-citationKarl, J. A., Johnson, F. N., Bucci, L., & Fischer, R. D. (2021) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03036758.2021.1915804 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Pirson, M. A., Langer, E., & Zilcha, S.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Langer, Ellen
- Venue
- Journal of Adult Development
- Published
- 2018-01-24
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 168-185
- ISSN
- 1068-0667 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3440
- OpenAlex
- W2784876129
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 79
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Adult Development (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- mindfulness measurement, scale development, factor structure, psychological well-being, life satisfaction, humor, physical well-being, job satisfaction, creativity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
