Optimisation of ultrasound-assisted extraction conditions for phenolic content and antioxidant activities of the alga Hormosira banksii using response surface methodology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dang et al. optimized ultrasonic conditions for highest yield of TPC and higher antioxidant activity; optimum conditions were 30 °C, 60 min, and 60% (150 W).
“Dang et al. [49] optimized the ultrasonic conditions for obtaining the highest yield of total phenolic content (TPC), and, consequently, higher antioxidant activity. They concluded that optimum conditions were temperature of 30 °C, time of 60 min and power of 60% (150 W).”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
Available data of UAE extraction of macroalgae shows polyphenols and antioxidants are the main extracted compounds, using solvents such as ethanol, distilled water, and methanol with different solid:solvent ratios.
“Available data of UAE extraction of macroalgae shows that polyphenols and antioxidants are the main extracted compounds from macroalgae (Table 2). Various solvents were used, such as ethanol, distilled water, and methanol with different solid:solvent ratio [7,49,50].”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
Antioxidant activity increased as TPC increased because phenolic compounds contribute most to antioxidant activity.
“Also, these studies showed that antioxidant activity increased as TPC increased because phenolic compounds contribute most to the antioxidant activity.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
Higher amount of TPC is shown by Kadam et al. because they used acid (0.03 M HCl) as solvent, while Dang et al. used ethanol; both authors used various species, which explained difference.
“The higher amount of TPC is shown by Kadam et al. [52], because they used acid (0.03 M HCl) as solvent, while Dang et al. [49] used ethanol. But, both authors used various species of macroalgae, which explained the difference between amounts of extracted polyphenols.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
According to Dang et al., temperature exhibited strongest influence on extraction yield and amount of extracted phenolic compounds, while Topuz et al. concluded solvent:seaweed ratio exhibited most influence on TPC.
“According to Dang et al. [49] the temperature exhibited the strongest influence on the extraction yield and amount of extracted phenolic compounds, while Topuz et al. [51] concluded that the solvent:seaweed ratio exhibited the most influence on TPC.”
From Overview on the Application of Modern Methods for the Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from Marine Macroalgae (2018) · cites this paper as [49]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 116
- Authors
- Dang, T. T., Van Vuong, Q., Schreider, M. J., Bowyer, M. C., Van Altena, I. A., & Scarlett, C. J.
- Affiliations
- Nha Trang University (VN)
- University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Scarlett, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Phycology
- Published
- 2017-06-14
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3161-3173
- ISSN
- 0921-8971 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-5176
- OpenAlex
- W2733220922
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Phycology (publishedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ramaciotti Foundations ((ES2012/0104))
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Keywords
- ultrasound-assisted extraction, Hormosira banksii, brown algae, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, ABTS, DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP, extraction parameter optimisation, natural antioxidants, phenolic compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review