Cited by 18Reproductive System and PregnancyPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy

Embryoscopy and karyotype findings of repeated miscarriages in recurrent pregnancy loss and spontaneous pregnancy loss

Open access
Feichtinger, M., Reiner, A., Hartmann, B., Philipp, T.·2018·Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the study was to assess cytogenetic and embryoscopic characteristics in subsequent miscarriages of spontaneous pregnancy losses (SPL) and recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL).Methods A retrospective cohort of 75 women was affected by repeated pregnancy loss. Of those, 34 had SPL, 24 primary RPL, and 17 secondary RPL. Ploidy status and morphology was analyzed by transcervical embryoscopic examination of the embryo and cytogenetic analysis of the chorionic villi in subsequent miscarriages.Results Similar rates of recurrent ploidy status were observed between first and second miscarriage in SPL and RPL (82.4% recurrent ploidy status in SPL, p > 0.999; 73% recurrent ploidy status in RPL, p = 0.227). No difference was found regarding recurrent abnormal morphology between SPL and RPL (p = 0.092). However, secondary RPL resulted significantly more often in recurrent abnormal morphology compared to primary RPL (p = 0.004).Conclusions High rates of recurrent normal/abnormal karyotypes were observed in all groups with a majority of embryos presenting with recurrent abnormal morphology. Secondary RPL presented significantly more often with recurrent abnormal morphology compared to primary RPL. These findings offer prognostic information for the affected patient and might impact treatment choice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10815-018-1226-1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alcohol use is an important modifiable risk factor for miscarriage.

    “Our literature review found that alcohol use is also an important modifiable risk factor, as high alcohol consumption during the first trimester is associated with an increase in miscarriage risk (aOR 1·67; 95% CI 1·31-2·19; Table 6). 25,39,62-70”

    From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction discusses genetic causes of miscarriage and possible maternal factors, but does not mention alcohol. Searches for alcohol use, first-trimester alcohol consumption, and the reported odds ratio found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High alcohol consumption during the first trimester is associated with an increase in miscarriage risk (aOR 1.67; 95% CI 1.31-2.19).

    “Our literature review found that alcohol use is also an important modifiable risk factor, as high alcohol consumption during the first trimester is associated with an increase in miscarriage risk (aOR 1·67; 95% CI 1·31-2·19; Table 6). 25,39,62-70”

    From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Methods describe embryoscopic and cytogenetic evaluation of first-trimester miscarriages, not an analysis of alcohol exposure. Searches for first-trimester alcohol consumption, miscarriage risk, and the reported aOR and confidence interval found no passage addressing the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High caffeine intake might be associated with miscarriage (aOR 1.56; 95% CI 0.98-2.50), although there was statistical uncertainty.

    “Our review indicated that high caffeine intake might be associated with miscarriage (aOR 1·56; 95% CI 0.98-2·50; Table 6), although there was statistical uncertainty in the finding. 25,39,71”

    From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Introduction discusses genetic causes and possible maternal factors in miscarriage, while the Discussion addresses embryoscopic and karyotype findings; neither addresses caffeine intake. Searches for caffeine, coffee, and the reported aOR and confidence interval found no passage supporting the claimed association. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 1990;336(8716):673-5.
  2. Poland BJ, Miller JR, Harris M, Livingston J. Spontaneous abor- tion. A study of 1,961 women and their conceptuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1981;102:1-32.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feichtinger, M., Reiner, A., Hartmann, B., & Philipp, T.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Philipp, T.
Venue
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Published
2018-06-18
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1401-1406
ISSN
  • 0740-7769 (ISSN-L)
  • 1058-0468
  • 1573-7330
OpenAlex
W2809668366
Cited by
18
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
Keywords
recurrent pregnancy loss, spontaneous pregnancy loss, embryo biopsy, embryo ploidy, embryo morphology, embryo abnormalities
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Habitual, Abortion, Induced, Adult, Chromosome Aberrations, Cytogenetics, Female, Fetoscopy, Humans, Pregnancy, Cohort Studies, Karyotype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review