(Re)assembling Communities
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approaches to community have sought to move beyond views of the group as a natural given arising out of coresidency or copresence, to how it emerges through convivial and emotional engagements between people, things, and landscapes.
“Approaches to community have sought to move beyond views of the group as a natural given arising out of coresidency or copresence, to how it emerges through convivial and emotional engagements between people, things, and landscapes (DeMarrais 2011;Harris 2014;Whittle 2005).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Harris 2014
Groups are continuously emergent through several crosscutting and nested scales.
“More critical understandings of what constitute communities recognize groups as continuously emergent through several crosscutting and nested scales (Harris 2014;Yaeger and Canuto 2000).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Harris 2014
Cites
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 33,219 · see citing works
Art And Agency: An Anthropological Theory
Gell, A. (1998) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198280132.001.0001 · Cited by 3,460 · see citing works
Heterarchy and the Analysis of Complex Societies
Crumley, C. L. (1995) · Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association · doi:10.1525/ap3a.1995.6.1.1 · Cited by 958 · see citing works
The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach
Fowler, C. (2004) · doi:10.4324/9780203583210 · Cited by 486 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Drawing on this point, Fowler thus argues that communities too may be constituted not only by humans, but by animals, places and things as well (Fowler 2004a, Chapter 5, 2004b, p. 95; see also Jones and Richards 2003; Ray and Thomas 2003; Pollard 2006).”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“Approaches to community have sought to move beyond views of the group as a natural given arising out of coresidency or copresence, to how it emerges through convivial and emotional engagements between people, things, and landscapes (DeMarrais 2011; Harris 2014; Whittle 2005).”
Background
- Authors
- Harris, O. J. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Leicester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Harris, Oliver J. T.
- ORCID
- Harris, Oliver J. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
- Published
- 2012-06-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 76-97
- ISSN
- 1072-5369 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7764
- OpenAlex
- W2094695470
- Cited by
- 157
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 66.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory (publishedVersion)
- Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Keywords
- community, assemblage theory, anthropocentrism, affect and emotion, agency, community formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
